Identifying Trends in Analogy Usage for Innovation: A Cross Sectional Product StudySource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011::page 111109DOI: 10.1115/1.4028100Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Designbyanalogy, including bioinspired design, is a powerful tool for innovation. Engineers need better tools to enhance ideation. To support tool creation, an exploratory crosssectional empirical product study of 70 analogyinspired products is conducted to report trends and associations among factors in the analogyinspired design process, giving a general account of realworld practices. Products are randomly sampled from three technology magazines and a bioinspired design database. Seven variables are developed and used to classify each example according to design team composition, analogy mapping approach, analogies used, and design outcomes. Results do not suggest significant differences between problemdriven approaches, which start from a design problem and find solutions in analogous domains, and solutiondriven approaches, which begin with knowledge in an analog domain and find design problems to solve. For instance, results suggest that both approaches yield products at about the same frequency, and both yield products with improved performance at statistically indistinguishable rates—thus, neither approach can be concluded to be advantageous over the other for improving product performance at this time. Overall, few associations are detected between design outcome variables and other variables, thus precluding recommendations for how to compose design teams, what approaches to promote, and what number and source of analogies to support in order to achieve the outcomes measured in this study.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Ngo, Peter | |
contributor author | Turner, Cameron J. | |
contributor author | Linsey, Julie S. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:10:46Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:10:46Z | |
date issued | 2014 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | md_136_11_111109.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155717 | |
description abstract | Designbyanalogy, including bioinspired design, is a powerful tool for innovation. Engineers need better tools to enhance ideation. To support tool creation, an exploratory crosssectional empirical product study of 70 analogyinspired products is conducted to report trends and associations among factors in the analogyinspired design process, giving a general account of realworld practices. Products are randomly sampled from three technology magazines and a bioinspired design database. Seven variables are developed and used to classify each example according to design team composition, analogy mapping approach, analogies used, and design outcomes. Results do not suggest significant differences between problemdriven approaches, which start from a design problem and find solutions in analogous domains, and solutiondriven approaches, which begin with knowledge in an analog domain and find design problems to solve. For instance, results suggest that both approaches yield products at about the same frequency, and both yield products with improved performance at statistically indistinguishable rates—thus, neither approach can be concluded to be advantageous over the other for improving product performance at this time. Overall, few associations are detected between design outcome variables and other variables, thus precluding recommendations for how to compose design teams, what approaches to promote, and what number and source of analogies to support in order to achieve the outcomes measured in this study. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Identifying Trends in Analogy Usage for Innovation: A Cross Sectional Product Study | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 136 | |
journal issue | 11 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4028100 | |
journal fristpage | 111109 | |
journal lastpage | 111109 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |