YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Identifying Trends in Analogy Usage for Innovation: A Cross Sectional Product Study

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011::page 111109
    Author:
    Ngo, Peter
    ,
    Turner, Cameron J.
    ,
    Linsey, Julie S.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4028100
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Designbyanalogy, including bioinspired design, is a powerful tool for innovation. Engineers need better tools to enhance ideation. To support tool creation, an exploratory crosssectional empirical product study of 70 analogyinspired products is conducted to report trends and associations among factors in the analogyinspired design process, giving a general account of realworld practices. Products are randomly sampled from three technology magazines and a bioinspired design database. Seven variables are developed and used to classify each example according to design team composition, analogy mapping approach, analogies used, and design outcomes. Results do not suggest significant differences between problemdriven approaches, which start from a design problem and find solutions in analogous domains, and solutiondriven approaches, which begin with knowledge in an analog domain and find design problems to solve. For instance, results suggest that both approaches yield products at about the same frequency, and both yield products with improved performance at statistically indistinguishable rates—thus, neither approach can be concluded to be advantageous over the other for improving product performance at this time. Overall, few associations are detected between design outcome variables and other variables, thus precluding recommendations for how to compose design teams, what approaches to promote, and what number and source of analogies to support in order to achieve the outcomes measured in this study.
    • Download: (1.042Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Identifying Trends in Analogy Usage for Innovation: A Cross Sectional Product Study

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/155717
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNgo, Peter
    contributor authorTurner, Cameron J.
    contributor authorLinsey, Julie S.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:10:46Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:10:46Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_136_11_111109.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155717
    description abstractDesignbyanalogy, including bioinspired design, is a powerful tool for innovation. Engineers need better tools to enhance ideation. To support tool creation, an exploratory crosssectional empirical product study of 70 analogyinspired products is conducted to report trends and associations among factors in the analogyinspired design process, giving a general account of realworld practices. Products are randomly sampled from three technology magazines and a bioinspired design database. Seven variables are developed and used to classify each example according to design team composition, analogy mapping approach, analogies used, and design outcomes. Results do not suggest significant differences between problemdriven approaches, which start from a design problem and find solutions in analogous domains, and solutiondriven approaches, which begin with knowledge in an analog domain and find design problems to solve. For instance, results suggest that both approaches yield products at about the same frequency, and both yield products with improved performance at statistically indistinguishable rates—thus, neither approach can be concluded to be advantageous over the other for improving product performance at this time. Overall, few associations are detected between design outcome variables and other variables, thus precluding recommendations for how to compose design teams, what approaches to promote, and what number and source of analogies to support in order to achieve the outcomes measured in this study.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleIdentifying Trends in Analogy Usage for Innovation: A Cross Sectional Product Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4028100
    journal fristpage111109
    journal lastpage111109
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian