YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 009::page 91004
    Author:
    Toh, Christine A.
    ,
    Miller, Scarlett R.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4027639
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Interacting with example products is an essential and widely practiced method in engineering design, yet little information exists on how the representation (pictorial or physical) or interaction a designer has with an example impacts design creativity. This is problematic because without this knowledge we do not understand how examples affect idea generation or how we can effectively modify or develop design methods to support example usage practices. In this paper, we report the results of a controlled study with first year engineering design students (N = 89) developed to investigate the impact of a designer's interaction with either a twodimensional (2D) pictorial image or a threedimensional (3D) product (through visual inspection or product dissection activities) and the resulting functional focus and creativity of the ideas developed. The results of this study reveal that participants who interacted with the physical example produced ideas that were less novel and less functionally focused than those who interacted with the 2D representation. Additionally, the results showed that participants who dissected the product produced a higher variety of ideas than those that visually inspected it. These results contribute to our understanding of the benefits and role of 2D and 3D designerproduct interactions during idea development. We use these findings to develop recommendations for the use of designerproduct interactions throughout the design process.
    • Download: (845.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/155685
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorToh, Christine A.
    contributor authorMiller, Scarlett R.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:10:41Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:10:41Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_136_09_091004.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155685
    description abstractInteracting with example products is an essential and widely practiced method in engineering design, yet little information exists on how the representation (pictorial or physical) or interaction a designer has with an example impacts design creativity. This is problematic because without this knowledge we do not understand how examples affect idea generation or how we can effectively modify or develop design methods to support example usage practices. In this paper, we report the results of a controlled study with first year engineering design students (N = 89) developed to investigate the impact of a designer's interaction with either a twodimensional (2D) pictorial image or a threedimensional (3D) product (through visual inspection or product dissection activities) and the resulting functional focus and creativity of the ideas developed. The results of this study reveal that participants who interacted with the physical example produced ideas that were less novel and less functionally focused than those who interacted with the 2D representation. Additionally, the results showed that participants who dissected the product produced a higher variety of ideas than those that visually inspected it. These results contribute to our understanding of the benefits and role of 2D and 3D designerproduct interactions during idea development. We use these findings to develop recommendations for the use of designerproduct interactions throughout the design process.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4027639
    journal fristpage91004
    journal lastpage91004
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian