YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Discussion: “Entransy is Now Clearâ€‌

    Source: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 009::page 95502
    Author:
    Awad, M. M.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4027821
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The purpose of this discussion is to place in perspective the concept of entransy, in view of the critiques published by Grazzini et al. (2013, “Entropy Versus Entransy,â€‌ J. NonEquilib. Thermodyn., 38, pp. 259–271), Herwig (2014, “Do We Really Need â€کEntransy’? A Critical Assessment of a New Quantity in Heat Transfer Analysis,â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(4), 045501), and Bejan 2014, ““Entransy,â€‌ and Its Lack of Content in Physics,â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(5), 055501), and especially the response just published by Guo et al. (2014, “A Response to Do We Really Need â€کEntransy’?â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(4), 046001). The conclusion is that entransy is improper and not needed, and that Guo et al.'s own response actually confirms this conclusion.
    • Download: (53.26Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Discussion: “Entransy is Now Clearâ€‌

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/155373
    Collections
    • Journal of Heat Transfer

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAwad, M. M.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:09:40Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:09:40Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0022-1481
    identifier otherht_136_09_095502.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/155373
    description abstractThe purpose of this discussion is to place in perspective the concept of entransy, in view of the critiques published by Grazzini et al. (2013, “Entropy Versus Entransy,â€‌ J. NonEquilib. Thermodyn., 38, pp. 259–271), Herwig (2014, “Do We Really Need â€کEntransy’? A Critical Assessment of a New Quantity in Heat Transfer Analysis,â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(4), 045501), and Bejan 2014, ““Entransy,â€‌ and Its Lack of Content in Physics,â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(5), 055501), and especially the response just published by Guo et al. (2014, “A Response to Do We Really Need â€کEntransy’?â€‌ ASME J. Heat Trans., 136(4), 046001). The conclusion is that entransy is improper and not needed, and that Guo et al.'s own response actually confirms this conclusion.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDiscussion: “Entransy is Now Clearâ€‌
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4027821
    journal fristpage95502
    journal lastpage95502
    identifier eissn1528-8943
    treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian