Show simple item record

contributor authorBattistoni, Michele
contributor authorSom, Sibendu
contributor authorLongman, Douglas E.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:07:39Z
date available2017-05-09T01:07:39Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier othergtp_136_06_061506.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154719
description abstractFuel injectors often feature cavitation because of large pressure gradients, which in some regions lead to extremely low pressures. The main objective of this work is to compare the prediction capabilities of two multiphase flow approaches for modeling cavitation in small nozzles, like those used in highpressure diesel or gasoline fuel injectors. Numerical results are assessed against quantitative high resolution experimental data collected at Argonne National Laboratory using synchrotron Xray radiography of a model nozzle. One numerical approach uses a homogeneous mixture model with the volume of fluid (VOF) method, in which phase change is modeled via the homogeneous relaxation model (HRM). The second approach is based on the multifluid nonhomogeneous model and uses the Rayleigh bubbledynamics model to account for cavitation. Both models include three components, i.e., liquid, vapor, and air, and the flow is compressible. Quantitatively, the amount of void predicted by the multifluid model is in good agreement with measurements, while the mixture model overpredicts the values. Qualitatively, void regions look similar and compare well with the experimental measurements. Grid converged results have been achieved for the prediction of mass flow rate while gridconvergence for void fraction is still an open point. Simulation results indicate that most of the vapor is produced at the nozzle entrance. In addition, downstream along the centerline, void due to expansion of noncondensable gases has been identified. The paper also includes a discussion about the effect of turbulent pressure fluctuations on cavitation inception.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Mixture and Multifluid Models for In Nozzle Cavitation Prediction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4026369
journal fristpage61506
journal lastpage61506
identifier eissn0742-4795
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record