Show simple item record

contributor authorSimon, Donald L.
contributor authorBorguet, Sأ©bastien
contributor authorLأ©onard, Olivier
contributor authorZhang, Xiaodong (Frank)
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:07:27Z
date available2017-05-09T01:07:27Z
date issued2014
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier othergtp_136_04_041201.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154670
description abstractRecent technology reviews have identified the need for objective assessments of aircraft engine health management (EHM) technologies. To help address this issue, a gas path diagnostic benchmark problem has been created and made publicly available. This software tool, referred to as the Propulsion Diagnostic Method Evaluation Strategy (ProDiMES), has been constructed based on feedback provided by the aircraft EHM community. It provides a standard benchmark problem enabling users to develop, evaluate, and compare diagnostic methods. This paper will present an overview of ProDiMES along with a description of four gas path diagnostic methods developed and applied to the problem. These methods, which include analytical and empirical diagnostic techniques, will be described and associated blindtestcase metric results will be presented and compared. Lessons learned along with recommendations for improving the public benchmarking processes will also be presented and discussed.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAircraft Engine Gas Path Diagnostic Methods: Public Benchmarking Results
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4025482
journal fristpage41201
journal lastpage41201
identifier eissn0742-4795
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record