YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison Among Different High Porosity Stent Configurations: Hemodynamic Effects of Treatment in a Large Cerebral Aneurysm

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 002::page 21013
    Author:
    Roszelle, Breigh N.
    ,
    Nair, Priya
    ,
    Gonzalez, L. Fernando
    ,
    Haithem Babiker, M.
    ,
    Ryan, Justin
    ,
    Frakes, David
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4026257
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Whether treated surgically or with endovascular techniques, large and giant cerebral aneurysms are particularly difficult to treat. Nevertheless, high porosity stents can be used to accomplish stentassisted coiling and even standalone stentbased treatments that have been shown to improve the occlusion of such aneurysms. Further, stent assisted coiling can reduce the incidence of complications that sometimes result from embolic coiling (e.g., neck remnants and thromboembolism). However, in treating cerebral aneurysms at bifurcation termini, it remains unclear which configuration of high porosity stents will result in the most advantageous hemodynamic environment. The goal of this study was to compare how three different stent configurations affected fluid dynamics in a large patientspecific aneurysm model. Three common stent configurations were deployed into the model: a halfY, a fullY, and a crossbar configuration. Particle image velocimetry was used to examine posttreatment flow patterns and quantify rootmeansquared velocity magnitude (VRMS) within the aneurysmal sac. While each configuration did reduce VRMS within the aneurysm, the fullY configuration resulted in the greatest reduction across all flow conditions (an average of 56% with respect to the untreated case). The experimental results agreed well with clinical follow up after treatment with the fullY configuration; there was evidence of thrombosis within the sac from the stents alone before coil embolization was performed. A computational simulation of the fullY configuration aligned well with the experimental and in vivo findings, indicating potential for clinically useful prediction of posttreatment hemodynamics. This study found that applying different stent configurations resulted in considerably different fluid dynamics in an anatomically accurate aneurysm model and that the fullY configuration performed best. The study indicates that knowledge of how stent configurations will affect posttreatment hemodynamics could be important in interventional planning and demonstrates the capability for such planning based on novel computational tools.
    • Download: (4.295Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison Among Different High Porosity Stent Configurations: Hemodynamic Effects of Treatment in a Large Cerebral Aneurysm

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/153952
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoszelle, Breigh N.
    contributor authorNair, Priya
    contributor authorGonzalez, L. Fernando
    contributor authorHaithem Babiker, M.
    contributor authorRyan, Justin
    contributor authorFrakes, David
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:05:15Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:05:15Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_136_02_021013.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153952
    description abstractWhether treated surgically or with endovascular techniques, large and giant cerebral aneurysms are particularly difficult to treat. Nevertheless, high porosity stents can be used to accomplish stentassisted coiling and even standalone stentbased treatments that have been shown to improve the occlusion of such aneurysms. Further, stent assisted coiling can reduce the incidence of complications that sometimes result from embolic coiling (e.g., neck remnants and thromboembolism). However, in treating cerebral aneurysms at bifurcation termini, it remains unclear which configuration of high porosity stents will result in the most advantageous hemodynamic environment. The goal of this study was to compare how three different stent configurations affected fluid dynamics in a large patientspecific aneurysm model. Three common stent configurations were deployed into the model: a halfY, a fullY, and a crossbar configuration. Particle image velocimetry was used to examine posttreatment flow patterns and quantify rootmeansquared velocity magnitude (VRMS) within the aneurysmal sac. While each configuration did reduce VRMS within the aneurysm, the fullY configuration resulted in the greatest reduction across all flow conditions (an average of 56% with respect to the untreated case). The experimental results agreed well with clinical follow up after treatment with the fullY configuration; there was evidence of thrombosis within the sac from the stents alone before coil embolization was performed. A computational simulation of the fullY configuration aligned well with the experimental and in vivo findings, indicating potential for clinically useful prediction of posttreatment hemodynamics. This study found that applying different stent configurations resulted in considerably different fluid dynamics in an anatomically accurate aneurysm model and that the fullY configuration performed best. The study indicates that knowledge of how stent configurations will affect posttreatment hemodynamics could be important in interventional planning and demonstrates the capability for such planning based on novel computational tools.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison Among Different High Porosity Stent Configurations: Hemodynamic Effects of Treatment in a Large Cerebral Aneurysm
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4026257
    journal fristpage21013
    journal lastpage21013
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian