YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dual Solution and Choked Flow Treatment in a Streamline Curvature Throughflow Solver

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 004::page 41004
    Author:
    Tiwari, Prashant
    ,
    Stein, Alex
    ,
    Lin, Yu
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4007444
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In most turbomachinery design systems, streamline curvature based throughflow calculations make the backbone of aero design process. The fast, reliable, and easy to understand solution is especially useful in performing several multistage design iterations in a short period of time. Although the streamline curvature based technique enjoys many benefits for subsonic applications, there are some challenges for transonic and supersonic flow applications, which is the focus of this paper. In this work, it is concluded that three key improvements are required to handle transonic flows in a streamline curvature throughflow solver. These are (1) the ability to overcome dual sub and supersonic solutions and guide the solver towards a supersonic flow solution where applicable; (2) a suitable technique to calculate the streamline curvature gradient term, which can avoid singularity at sonic meridional Mach number and high gradient values in transonic flows; and (3) a suitable technique to handle choked flow in the turbomachinery flowpath. Solution procedures for “dualsolutionâ€‌ and choked flow treatment are new and developed as part of this work. However, a procedure for calculating streamline curvature gradient is leveraged from earlier work done by Denton (1978, “Throughflow Calculations for Transonic Axial Flow Turbines,â€‌ Trans. ASME, 100, pp. 212–218) and Came (1995, “Streamline Curvature Throughflow Analysis,â€‌ VDIBer., 1185, p. 291). Implementation of these improvements is performed in a streamline curvature based throughflow solver. Numerical improvements presented here have been tested for a range of compressor and turbine cases (both subsonic and supersonic). It is shown that the numerical improvements presented in this paper resulted in an enhanced version of the streamline curvature throughflow solver. The new code produces consistent solutions for subsonic applications with no sacrifice in the accuracy of the solver. However, considerable robustness improvements are achieved for transonic turbine cases.
    • Download: (1.104Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Dual Solution and Choked Flow Treatment in a Streamline Curvature Throughflow Solver

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/153458
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTiwari, Prashant
    contributor authorStein, Alex
    contributor authorLin, Yu
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:03:39Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:03:39Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherturb_135_4_041004.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153458
    description abstractIn most turbomachinery design systems, streamline curvature based throughflow calculations make the backbone of aero design process. The fast, reliable, and easy to understand solution is especially useful in performing several multistage design iterations in a short period of time. Although the streamline curvature based technique enjoys many benefits for subsonic applications, there are some challenges for transonic and supersonic flow applications, which is the focus of this paper. In this work, it is concluded that three key improvements are required to handle transonic flows in a streamline curvature throughflow solver. These are (1) the ability to overcome dual sub and supersonic solutions and guide the solver towards a supersonic flow solution where applicable; (2) a suitable technique to calculate the streamline curvature gradient term, which can avoid singularity at sonic meridional Mach number and high gradient values in transonic flows; and (3) a suitable technique to handle choked flow in the turbomachinery flowpath. Solution procedures for “dualsolutionâ€‌ and choked flow treatment are new and developed as part of this work. However, a procedure for calculating streamline curvature gradient is leveraged from earlier work done by Denton (1978, “Throughflow Calculations for Transonic Axial Flow Turbines,â€‌ Trans. ASME, 100, pp. 212–218) and Came (1995, “Streamline Curvature Throughflow Analysis,â€‌ VDIBer., 1185, p. 291). Implementation of these improvements is performed in a streamline curvature based throughflow solver. Numerical improvements presented here have been tested for a range of compressor and turbine cases (both subsonic and supersonic). It is shown that the numerical improvements presented in this paper resulted in an enhanced version of the streamline curvature throughflow solver. The new code produces consistent solutions for subsonic applications with no sacrifice in the accuracy of the solver. However, considerable robustness improvements are achieved for transonic turbine cases.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDual Solution and Choked Flow Treatment in a Streamline Curvature Throughflow Solver
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4007444
    journal fristpage41004
    journal lastpage41004
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian