contributor author | Barker, B. | |
contributor author | Casaday, B. | |
contributor author | Shankara, P. | |
contributor author | Ameri, A. | |
contributor author | Bons, J. P. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:03:17Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:03:17Z | |
date issued | 2013 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | turb_135_1_011015.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/153375 | |
description abstract | Coal ash deposition was numerically modeled on a GEE3 high pressure turbine vane passage. A model was developed, in conjunction with FLUENTâ„¢ software, to track individual particles through the turbine passage. Two sticking models were used to predict the rates of deposition which were subsequently compared to experimental trends. The strengths and limitations of the two sticking models, the critical viscosity model and the critical velocity model, are discussed. The former model ties deposition exclusively to particle temperature while the latter considers both the particle temperature and velocity. Both incorporate some level of empiricism, though the critical viscosity model has the potential to be more readily adaptable to different ash compositions. Experimental results show that both numerical models are reasonably accurate in predicting the initial stages of deposition. Beyond the initial stage of deposition, for which transient effects must be accounted. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Coal Ash Deposition on Nozzle Guide Vanes—Part II: Computational Modeling | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4006399 | |
journal fristpage | 11015 | |
journal lastpage | 11015 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |