YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes1

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 012::page 121001
    Author:
    Van Bossuyt, Douglas L.
    ,
    Dong, Andy
    ,
    Tumer, Irem Y.
    ,
    Carvalho, Lucila
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4025118
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Risk management is a critical part of engineering practice in industry. Yet, the attitudes of engineers toward risk remain unknown and are not measured. This paper presents the development of a psychometric scale, the engineeringdomainspecific risktaking (EDOSPERT) test, to measure engineers' risk aversion and risk seeking attitudes. Consistent with a similar psychometric scale to assess general risk attitudes, engineering risk attitude is not single domain and is not consistent across domains. Engineers have different risk attitudes toward five identified domains of engineering risk: processes, procedures and practices; engineering ethics; training; product functionality and design; and legal issues. Psychometric risk profiling with EDOSPERT provides companies a standard to assess domainspecific engineering risk attitude within organizations and across organizations. It provides engineering educators a standard to assess the understanding of engineering students to the types of risks they would encounter in professional practice and their personal attitude toward responding to those risks. Appropriate interventions can then be implemented to shape risk attitudes as appropriate. Riskbased design decisions can also be shaped by a better understanding of engineer and customer risk attitude. Understanding engineers' risk attitudes is crucial in interpreting how individual engineers will respond to risk in their engineering activities and the numerous design decisions they make across the various domains of engineering risk found in professional practice.
    • Download: (173.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes1

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/152568
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVan Bossuyt, Douglas L.
    contributor authorDong, Andy
    contributor authorTumer, Irem Y.
    contributor authorCarvalho, Lucila
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:01:04Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:01:04Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_135_12_121001.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152568
    description abstractRisk management is a critical part of engineering practice in industry. Yet, the attitudes of engineers toward risk remain unknown and are not measured. This paper presents the development of a psychometric scale, the engineeringdomainspecific risktaking (EDOSPERT) test, to measure engineers' risk aversion and risk seeking attitudes. Consistent with a similar psychometric scale to assess general risk attitudes, engineering risk attitude is not single domain and is not consistent across domains. Engineers have different risk attitudes toward five identified domains of engineering risk: processes, procedures and practices; engineering ethics; training; product functionality and design; and legal issues. Psychometric risk profiling with EDOSPERT provides companies a standard to assess domainspecific engineering risk attitude within organizations and across organizations. It provides engineering educators a standard to assess the understanding of engineering students to the types of risks they would encounter in professional practice and their personal attitude toward responding to those risks. Appropriate interventions can then be implemented to shape risk attitudes as appropriate. Riskbased design decisions can also be shaped by a better understanding of engineer and customer risk attitude. Understanding engineers' risk attitudes is crucial in interpreting how individual engineers will respond to risk in their engineering activities and the numerous design decisions they make across the various domains of engineering risk found in professional practice.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOn Measuring Engineering Risk Attitudes1
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4025118
    journal fristpage121001
    journal lastpage121001
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian