YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Three Dimensional Constraint Effects on the Slitting Method for Measuring Residual Stress

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 003::page 31006
    Author:
    Aydؤ±ner, C. Can
    ,
    Prime, Michael B.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4023849
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The incremental slitting or crack compliance method determines a residual stress profile from strain measurements taken as a slit is incrementally extended into the material. To date, the inverse calculation of residual stress from strain data conveniently adopts a twodimensional, plane strain approximation for the calibration coefficients. This study provides the first characterization of the errors caused by the 2D approximation, which is a concern since inverse analyses tend to magnify such errors. Threedimensional finite element calculations are used to study the effect of the outofplane dimension through a large scale parametric study over the sample width, Poisson's ratio, and strain gauge width. Energy and strain response to point loads at every slit depth is calculated giving pointwise measures of the outofplane constraint level (the scale between plane strain and plane stress). It is shown that the pointwise level of constraint varies with slit depth, a factor that makes the effective constraint a function of the residual stress to be measured. Using a series expansion inverse solution, the 3D simulated data of a representative set of residual stress profiles are reduced with 2D calibration coefficients to yield the error in stress. The sample width below which it is better to use plane stress compliances than plane strain is shown to be about 0.7 times the sample thickness; however, even using the better approximation, the rms stress errors sometimes still exceed 3% with peak errors exceeding 6% for Poisson's ratio 0.3, and errors increase sharply for larger Poisson's ratios. The error is significant, yet, error magnification from the inverse analysis in this case is mild compared to, e.g., plasticity based errors. Finally, a scalar correction (effective constraint) over the planestrain coefficients is derived to minimize the rootmeansquare (rms) stress error. Using the posed scalar correction, the error can be further cut in half for all widths and Poisson's ratios.
    • Download: (1.513Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Three Dimensional Constraint Effects on the Slitting Method for Measuring Residual Stress

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/151786
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAydؤ±ner, C. Can
    contributor authorPrime, Michael B.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:58:48Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:58:48Z
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier othermats_135_3_031006.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151786
    description abstractThe incremental slitting or crack compliance method determines a residual stress profile from strain measurements taken as a slit is incrementally extended into the material. To date, the inverse calculation of residual stress from strain data conveniently adopts a twodimensional, plane strain approximation for the calibration coefficients. This study provides the first characterization of the errors caused by the 2D approximation, which is a concern since inverse analyses tend to magnify such errors. Threedimensional finite element calculations are used to study the effect of the outofplane dimension through a large scale parametric study over the sample width, Poisson's ratio, and strain gauge width. Energy and strain response to point loads at every slit depth is calculated giving pointwise measures of the outofplane constraint level (the scale between plane strain and plane stress). It is shown that the pointwise level of constraint varies with slit depth, a factor that makes the effective constraint a function of the residual stress to be measured. Using a series expansion inverse solution, the 3D simulated data of a representative set of residual stress profiles are reduced with 2D calibration coefficients to yield the error in stress. The sample width below which it is better to use plane stress compliances than plane strain is shown to be about 0.7 times the sample thickness; however, even using the better approximation, the rms stress errors sometimes still exceed 3% with peak errors exceeding 6% for Poisson's ratio 0.3, and errors increase sharply for larger Poisson's ratios. The error is significant, yet, error magnification from the inverse analysis in this case is mild compared to, e.g., plasticity based errors. Finally, a scalar correction (effective constraint) over the planestrain coefficients is derived to minimize the rootmeansquare (rms) stress error. Using the posed scalar correction, the error can be further cut in half for all widths and Poisson's ratios.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThree Dimensional Constraint Effects on the Slitting Method for Measuring Residual Stress
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4023849
    journal fristpage31006
    journal lastpage31006
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian