Fidelity of the Estimation of the Deformation Gradient From Data Deduced From the Motion of Markers Placed on a Body That is Subject to an Inhomogeneous Deformation FieldSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 008::page 81004DOI: 10.1115/1.4023629Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Practically all experimental measurements related to the response of nonlinear bodies that are made within a purely mechanical context are concerned with inhomogeneous deformations, though, in many experiments, much effort is taken to engender homogeneous deformation fields. However, in experiments that are carried out in vivo, one cannot control the nature of the deformation. The quantity of interest is the deformation gradient and/or its invariants. The deformation gradient is estimated by tracking positions of a finite number of markers placed in the body. Any experimental datareduction procedure based on tracking a finite number of markers will, for a general inhomogeneous deformation, introduce an error in the determination of the deformation gradient, even in the idealized case, when the positions of the markers are measured with no error. In our study, we are interested in a quantitative description of the difference between the true gradient and its estimate obtained by tracking the markers, that is, in the quantitative description of the induced error due to the data reduction. We derive a rigorous upper bound on the error, and we discuss what factors influence the error bound and the actual error itself. Finally, we illustrate the results by studying a practically interesting model problem. We show that different choices of the tracked markers can lead to substantially different estimates of the deformation gradient and its invariants. It is alarming that even qualitative features of the material under consideration, such as the incompressibility of the body, can be evaluated differently with different choices of the tracked markers. We also demonstrate that the derived error estimate can be used as a tool for choosing the appropriate marker set that leads to the deformation gradient estimate with the least guaranteed error.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Pr¯،a, Vأt | |
contributor author | Rajagopal, K. R. | |
contributor author | Saravanan, U. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:56:43Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:56:43Z | |
date issued | 2013 | |
identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
identifier other | bio_135_8_081004.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/151070 | |
description abstract | Practically all experimental measurements related to the response of nonlinear bodies that are made within a purely mechanical context are concerned with inhomogeneous deformations, though, in many experiments, much effort is taken to engender homogeneous deformation fields. However, in experiments that are carried out in vivo, one cannot control the nature of the deformation. The quantity of interest is the deformation gradient and/or its invariants. The deformation gradient is estimated by tracking positions of a finite number of markers placed in the body. Any experimental datareduction procedure based on tracking a finite number of markers will, for a general inhomogeneous deformation, introduce an error in the determination of the deformation gradient, even in the idealized case, when the positions of the markers are measured with no error. In our study, we are interested in a quantitative description of the difference between the true gradient and its estimate obtained by tracking the markers, that is, in the quantitative description of the induced error due to the data reduction. We derive a rigorous upper bound on the error, and we discuss what factors influence the error bound and the actual error itself. Finally, we illustrate the results by studying a practically interesting model problem. We show that different choices of the tracked markers can lead to substantially different estimates of the deformation gradient and its invariants. It is alarming that even qualitative features of the material under consideration, such as the incompressibility of the body, can be evaluated differently with different choices of the tracked markers. We also demonstrate that the derived error estimate can be used as a tool for choosing the appropriate marker set that leads to the deformation gradient estimate with the least guaranteed error. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Fidelity of the Estimation of the Deformation Gradient From Data Deduced From the Motion of Markers Placed on a Body That is Subject to an Inhomogeneous Deformation Field | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4023629 | |
journal fristpage | 81004 | |
journal lastpage | 81004 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |