YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance Analysis of Finite Element and Energy Based Analytical Methods for Modeling of PCLD Treated Beams

    Source: Journal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 003::page 34501
    Author:
    Sanjiv Kumar
    ,
    Rajiv Kumar
    ,
    Rakesh Sehgal
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4006232
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: For active/passive vibration control applications, low order models of flexible structures are always preferable. Mathematical models of passive constrained layer damping (PCLD)/active constrained layer damping (ACLD) treatment generated by energy based analytical methods are of much smaller orders as compared to finite element methods (FEM). Using these analytical methods, one can get rid of complex model reduction techniques, since these model reduction techniques are subjected to errors if applied directly to PCLD or ACLD systems. However, analytical techniques cannot be applied blindly to any PCLD system. There is significant error in loss factor prediction for certain boundary conditions. This error is also dependent on the relative thicknesses of Viscoelastic material layer, constraining layer and base beam. For certain combination of the above thicknesses and under certain boundary conditions, the models generated are useless for controller design purposes. On the other hand, FEM are highly robust and can be applied easily to any set of boundary conditions with guaranteed accuracy. Also, results predicted by this method are of high accuracy for any combinations of thicknesses of different layers. The only disadvantage of this technique is the high order of the developed model. Detailed performance comparison of both the techniques to predict the modal parameters of the PCLD treated beam is presented.
    keyword(s): Finite element methods , Analytical methods , Finite element analysis , Modeling , Boundary-value problems , Errors , Finite element model , Frequency , Thickness , Equations of motion , Functions , Simply supported beams AND Shapes ,
    • Download: (2.397Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance Analysis of Finite Element and Energy Based Analytical Methods for Modeling of PCLD Treated Beams

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/150651
    Collections
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSanjiv Kumar
    contributor authorRajiv Kumar
    contributor authorRakesh Sehgal
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:55:39Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:55:39Z
    date copyrightJune, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1048-9002
    identifier otherJVACEK-28919#034501_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/150651
    description abstractFor active/passive vibration control applications, low order models of flexible structures are always preferable. Mathematical models of passive constrained layer damping (PCLD)/active constrained layer damping (ACLD) treatment generated by energy based analytical methods are of much smaller orders as compared to finite element methods (FEM). Using these analytical methods, one can get rid of complex model reduction techniques, since these model reduction techniques are subjected to errors if applied directly to PCLD or ACLD systems. However, analytical techniques cannot be applied blindly to any PCLD system. There is significant error in loss factor prediction for certain boundary conditions. This error is also dependent on the relative thicknesses of Viscoelastic material layer, constraining layer and base beam. For certain combination of the above thicknesses and under certain boundary conditions, the models generated are useless for controller design purposes. On the other hand, FEM are highly robust and can be applied easily to any set of boundary conditions with guaranteed accuracy. Also, results predicted by this method are of high accuracy for any combinations of thicknesses of different layers. The only disadvantage of this technique is the high order of the developed model. Detailed performance comparison of both the techniques to predict the modal parameters of the PCLD treated beam is presented.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePerformance Analysis of Finite Element and Energy Based Analytical Methods for Modeling of PCLD Treated Beams
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4006232
    journal fristpage34501
    identifier eissn1528-8927
    keywordsFinite element methods
    keywordsAnalytical methods
    keywordsFinite element analysis
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsFinite element model
    keywordsFrequency
    keywordsThickness
    keywordsEquations of motion
    keywordsFunctions
    keywordsSimply supported beams AND Shapes
    treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian