Show simple item record

contributor authorBrent A. Odom
contributor authorJonathan A. Sherbeck
contributor authorRavi S. Prasher
contributor authorPatrick E. Phelan
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:54:31Z
date available2017-05-09T00:54:31Z
date copyrightSeptember, 2012
date issued2012
identifier issn1948-5085
identifier otherJTSEBV-926075#031009_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/150281
description abstractPumped refrigerant loops (PRL) which are aimed at eventually cooling electronics often reject heat to a vapor compression cycle. A vapor compression cycle (VCC) uses a proportional, integral, and derivative controller to maintain desired conditions in its evaporator. These controllers apply an algorithm that has an associated time response. The time response and constant adjustment of the expansion valve in the VCC can result in rapid deviations from the set point temperature for the evaporator. When a PRL is coupled to a VCC through an intermediate process fluid, the result in the PRL can be rapid system-wide changes in pressure and mass flow rate depending on equipment specifications. Three options for removing heat from the PRL were evaluated for their effect on PRL system pressure and mass flow rate. Two of the options were variations of the coupling option using an FTS Maxicool RC100 recirculating chiller, while the third eliminated the coupling to the Maxicool’s VCC and used an ice water heat sink in its place. Rejecting heat from a PRL to an ice water heat sink provided more stable system pressures and mass flow rates and less of a propensity for premature dry out than rejecting heat through an intermediate process fluid to the MaxiCool’s VCC. The PRL priming time required when coupled to the ice water heat sink occurred in seconds rather than the minutes required when coupled to the VCC. For certain operating conditions in which thermal storage can be taken advantage of, the ice water heat sink can provide electricity usage cost savings of 10% or more over using a VCC alone. An ice water heat sink for a PRL has potential advantages over being coupled to a VCC, particularly for a laboratory experimental setup and potentially for larger applications.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleHeat Sink Effect on System Pressure and Mass Flow Rate in a Pumped Refrigerant Loop
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
identifier doi10.1115/1.4006716
journal fristpage31009
identifier eissn1948-5093
keywordsPressure
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsHeat
keywordsTemperature
keywordsIce
keywordsHeat sinks
keywordsRefrigerants
keywordsWater
keywordsFluids
keywordsVapors
keywordsCondensers (steam plant)
keywordsStress
keywordsCooling
keywordsControl equipment AND Fourier transform spectroscopy
treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2012:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record