YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Medical Devices
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Medical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey-Based Assessment of Industry Experience

    Source: Journal of Medical Devices:;2012:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002::page 21015
    Author:
    Jan B. Pietzsch
    ,
    Marta G. Zanchi
    ,
    John H. Linehan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4006781
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Medical device regulation plays a significant role in promoting and protecting the public health. But the regulatory process and its requirements also exercise substantial influence over the design, development, and commercialization of new medical technologies. In recent months, FDA’s premarket notification (510(k)) process, through which the majority of medical devices are cleared to the market, has been at the forefront of policy discussions, and efforts are continuing to further analyze and strengthen the process. In this paper, we report findings from our recently completed, comprehensive, industry-wide survey to provide input and perspective for the current discussions about changes to the 510(k) process. The findings reported here focus on five aspects of the 510(k) process with principal relevance to medical technology developers and innovators: predictability of the process, impact of regulatory requirements, role of guidance documents, interaction with FDA, and international comparisons. The results confirm the substantial influence of regulatory requirements on investment decisions and development priorities. The data suggest that improvement of regulatory process predictability needs to be a top priority for all stakeholders – especially FDA. Increasing the number of guidance documents available to industry, and ensuring that their content is timely updated to reflect current FDA thinking, could be one way to achieve this goal. Consistent implementation of the regulatory process and enhanced communications between sponsors and the agency could further contribute to improvements, along with efforts to provide additional training opportunities for reviewers and industry personnel. The survey data suggest that small companies, when compared to large companies, are particularly challenged by the current process, and should therefore receive particular attention in any reform and improvement efforts.
    keyword(s): Medical devices , Frequency-domain analysis AND Regulations ,
    • Download: (698.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Medical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey-Based Assessment of Industry Experience

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/149931
    Collections
    • Journal of Medical Devices

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJan B. Pietzsch
    contributor authorMarta G. Zanchi
    contributor authorJohn H. Linehan
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:53:35Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:53:35Z
    date copyrightJune, 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1932-6181
    identifier otherJMDOA4-28023#021015_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149931
    description abstractMedical device regulation plays a significant role in promoting and protecting the public health. But the regulatory process and its requirements also exercise substantial influence over the design, development, and commercialization of new medical technologies. In recent months, FDA’s premarket notification (510(k)) process, through which the majority of medical devices are cleared to the market, has been at the forefront of policy discussions, and efforts are continuing to further analyze and strengthen the process. In this paper, we report findings from our recently completed, comprehensive, industry-wide survey to provide input and perspective for the current discussions about changes to the 510(k) process. The findings reported here focus on five aspects of the 510(k) process with principal relevance to medical technology developers and innovators: predictability of the process, impact of regulatory requirements, role of guidance documents, interaction with FDA, and international comparisons. The results confirm the substantial influence of regulatory requirements on investment decisions and development priorities. The data suggest that improvement of regulatory process predictability needs to be a top priority for all stakeholders – especially FDA. Increasing the number of guidance documents available to industry, and ensuring that their content is timely updated to reflect current FDA thinking, could be one way to achieve this goal. Consistent implementation of the regulatory process and enhanced communications between sponsors and the agency could further contribute to improvements, along with efforts to provide additional training opportunities for reviewers and industry personnel. The survey data suggest that small companies, when compared to large companies, are particularly challenged by the current process, and should therefore receive particular attention in any reform and improvement efforts.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMedical Device Innovators and the 510(k) Regulatory Pathway: Implications of a Survey-Based Assessment of Industry Experience
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Medical Devices
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4006781
    journal fristpage21015
    identifier eissn1932-619X
    keywordsMedical devices
    keywordsFrequency-domain analysis AND Regulations
    treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2012:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian