YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Study of Dimensional Repeatability and Fatigue Life for Deformation Machining Bending Mode

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 006::page 61009
    Author:
    A. Agrawal
    ,
    J. Ziegert
    ,
    S. Smith
    ,
    B. Woody
    ,
    J. Cao
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4007716
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Deformation machining (DM) is a hybrid process which combines two emerging manufacturing processes, machining of thin structures and single-point incremental forming (SPIF). This hybrid process enables the creation of structures that have geometries that would be difficult or impossible to create using any either process alone. A comprehensive study of DM bending mode components has been carried out in this paper by studying their dimensional repeatability and fatigue life and comparing these with similar components fabricated with sheet metal. Experimental studies have been performed for part features created by the DM “bending mode” process, in which a thin vertical wall is machined on the part, and then incrementally bent with a single-point forming tool. The dimensional repeatability of DM components is compared with sheet metal components made by single-point incremental forming and conventional bending in a press brake [Agrawal et al., 2010, “Comparison of Dimensional Repeatability of Deformation Machined Components With Sheet Metal Components,” North American Manufacturing Research Conference, NAMRC 38, Transactions of NAMRI/SME, Vol. 38, pp. 571–576]. The results of this study indicate that the DM process is not capable of holding tolerances as tight as a standard milling process. This may be due to local variations in material properties that influence the yield strength and resulting springback. However, thin components created by DM are more repeatable than similar components created from sheet metal using SPIF, but less repeatable than components created by conventional bending of sheet metal. The second objective of the present work is to investigate whether components fabricated using the DM process can be considered for fatigue critical applications [Megahed et al., 1996, “Low-Cycle Fatigue in Rotating Cantilever Under Bending I: Theoretical Analysis,” Int. J. Fatigue, 18(6), pp. 401–412; Khalid et al., 2007, “Bending Fatigue Behavior of Hybrid Aluminum/Composite Drive Shafts,” Mater. Des., 28, pp. 329–334]. Studies were performed to experimentally compare the fatigue life of components fabricated by DM process with sheet metal components made by single-point incremental forming and conventional bending. Results of the study indicate that sheet metal SPIF components under the present loading conditions have significantly longer fatigue life of approximately 3900–5500 cycles, compared to DM and sheet metal conventionally bent components with approximately equal fatigue life of 2200–3900 cycles.
    keyword(s): Deformation , Machining , Sheet metal , Fatigue life , Cycles AND Stress ,
    • Download: (7.496Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Study of Dimensional Repeatability and Fatigue Life for Deformation Machining Bending Mode

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/149595
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. Agrawal
    contributor authorJ. Ziegert
    contributor authorS. Smith
    contributor authorB. Woody
    contributor authorJ. Cao
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:52:37Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:52:37Z
    date copyright41244
    date issued2012
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier otherJMSEFK-926545#manu_134_6_061009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/149595
    description abstractDeformation machining (DM) is a hybrid process which combines two emerging manufacturing processes, machining of thin structures and single-point incremental forming (SPIF). This hybrid process enables the creation of structures that have geometries that would be difficult or impossible to create using any either process alone. A comprehensive study of DM bending mode components has been carried out in this paper by studying their dimensional repeatability and fatigue life and comparing these with similar components fabricated with sheet metal. Experimental studies have been performed for part features created by the DM “bending mode” process, in which a thin vertical wall is machined on the part, and then incrementally bent with a single-point forming tool. The dimensional repeatability of DM components is compared with sheet metal components made by single-point incremental forming and conventional bending in a press brake [Agrawal et al., 2010, “Comparison of Dimensional Repeatability of Deformation Machined Components With Sheet Metal Components,” North American Manufacturing Research Conference, NAMRC 38, Transactions of NAMRI/SME, Vol. 38, pp. 571–576]. The results of this study indicate that the DM process is not capable of holding tolerances as tight as a standard milling process. This may be due to local variations in material properties that influence the yield strength and resulting springback. However, thin components created by DM are more repeatable than similar components created from sheet metal using SPIF, but less repeatable than components created by conventional bending of sheet metal. The second objective of the present work is to investigate whether components fabricated using the DM process can be considered for fatigue critical applications [Megahed et al., 1996, “Low-Cycle Fatigue in Rotating Cantilever Under Bending I: Theoretical Analysis,” Int. J. Fatigue, 18(6), pp. 401–412; Khalid et al., 2007, “Bending Fatigue Behavior of Hybrid Aluminum/Composite Drive Shafts,” Mater. Des., 28, pp. 329–334]. Studies were performed to experimentally compare the fatigue life of components fabricated by DM process with sheet metal components made by single-point incremental forming and conventional bending. Results of the study indicate that sheet metal SPIF components under the present loading conditions have significantly longer fatigue life of approximately 3900–5500 cycles, compared to DM and sheet metal conventionally bent components with approximately equal fatigue life of 2200–3900 cycles.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleStudy of Dimensional Repeatability and Fatigue Life for Deformation Machining Bending Mode
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4007716
    journal fristpage61009
    identifier eissn1528-8935
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsMachining
    keywordsSheet metal
    keywordsFatigue life
    keywordsCycles AND Stress
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian