| contributor author | Aditya A. Shah | |
| contributor author | Christiaan J. J. Paredis | |
| contributor author | Roger Burkhart | |
| contributor author | Dirk Schaefer | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:48:51Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:48:51Z | |
| date copyright | 41244 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier issn | 1530-9827 | |
| identifier other | JCISB6-926512#jcis_12_4_041006.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148383 | |
| description abstract | In this paper, we present a framework for automated component sizing to extend a designer's ability to evaluate a particular configuration during the architecture exploration phase of a design process. Component sizing is a hard problem to solve, both from a computational and modeling aspect. This is because of competing objectives, requirements from multiple disciplines, and the need to find a good solution quickly for the architecture being considered. In current approaches, designers rely on heuristics and iterate over the multiple objectives and requirements until a satisfactory solution is found. To improve on this state of practice, we introduce advances in the following two areas: (a) solving the problem efficiently so that all of the imposed requirements are satisfied simultaneously and the solution obtained is mathematically optimal and (b) modeling a component sizing problem in a manner that is convenient to designers. An acausal, algebraic, equation-based, declarative modeling approach using mathematical programming (GAMS) is taken to solve these problems more efficiently. The object management group systems modeling language (OMG SysML™) is used to model component sizing problems in order to facilitate problem formulation, model reuse and automatic generation of low-level code that can be solved using GAMS and its solvers. This framework is demonstrated by applying it to an example of a hydraulic log splitter. Based on this initial example, we discuss two advantages of this framework—total time taken in solving multiple scenarios for a given configuration and the graphical representation of a problem in SysML. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Combining Mathematical Programming and SysML for Automated Component Sizing of Hydraulic Systems | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 12 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4007764 | |
| journal fristpage | 41006 | |
| identifier eissn | 1530-9827 | |
| keywords | Force | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Modeling | |
| keywords | Equations | |
| keywords | Hydraulic systems | |
| keywords | Computer programming | |
| keywords | Cylinders AND Optimization | |
| tree | Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering:;2012:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |