YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Level of Modularity and Different Levels of System Granularity

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 010::page 101007
    Author:
    Noemi Chiriac
    ,
    Dusan Lysy
    ,
    Eun Suk Suh
    ,
    Katja Hölttä-Otto
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4005069
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: All complex system development projects involve analysis of the system architecture. Thus far it has been assumed that there is some correct system decomposition that can be used in the architectural analysis without consideration of the sensitivity of the results to the chosen level of decomposition. We represent 88 idealized system architectures and a real complex system as a design structure matrix at two different levels of decomposition. We analyze these architectures for their degree of modularity. We find that the degree of modularity can vary for the same system when the system is represented at the two different levels of granularity. For example, the printing system used in the case study is considered slightly integral at a higher level of decomposition and quite modular at a lower level of decomposition. We further find that even though the overall results can be different depending on the level of decomposition, the direction of change toward more modular or more integral can be calculated the same regardless of the level of decomposition. We conclude that the level of decomposition can distort the results of architectural analysis and care must be taken in defining the system decomposition for any analysis.
    keyword(s): Printing , System architecture , Complex systems , Bubbles , Density , Design AND Structures ,
    • Download: (2.088Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Level of Modularity and Different Levels of System Granularity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/146982
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNoemi Chiriac
    contributor authorDusan Lysy
    contributor authorEun Suk Suh
    contributor authorKatja Hölttä-Otto
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:45:43Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:45:43Z
    date copyrightOctober, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27954#101007_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/146982
    description abstractAll complex system development projects involve analysis of the system architecture. Thus far it has been assumed that there is some correct system decomposition that can be used in the architectural analysis without consideration of the sensitivity of the results to the chosen level of decomposition. We represent 88 idealized system architectures and a real complex system as a design structure matrix at two different levels of decomposition. We analyze these architectures for their degree of modularity. We find that the degree of modularity can vary for the same system when the system is represented at the two different levels of granularity. For example, the printing system used in the case study is considered slightly integral at a higher level of decomposition and quite modular at a lower level of decomposition. We further find that even though the overall results can be different depending on the level of decomposition, the direction of change toward more modular or more integral can be calculated the same regardless of the level of decomposition. We conclude that the level of decomposition can distort the results of architectural analysis and care must be taken in defining the system decomposition for any analysis.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLevel of Modularity and Different Levels of System Granularity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4005069
    journal fristpage101007
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsPrinting
    keywordsSystem architecture
    keywordsComplex systems
    keywordsBubbles
    keywordsDensity
    keywordsDesign AND Structures
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian