Straight-Build Assembly Optimization: A Method to Minimize Stage-by-Stage Eccentricity Error in the Assembly of Axisymmetric Rigid Components (Two-Dimensional Case Study)Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 003::page 31014DOI: 10.1115/1.4004202Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: For assembly of rotating machines, such as machining tools, industrial turbomachinery, or aircraft gas turbine engines, parts need to be assembled in order to avoid internal bending of the geometric axis of the rotor to meet functional and vibration requirements. Straight-build assembly optimization is a way of joining parts together in order to have a straight line between the centers of the components. Straight-build assembly is achieved by minimizing eccentricity error stage-by-stage in the assembly. To achieve minimal eccentricity, this paper proposes three assembly procedures: (i) table-axis-build assembly by minimizing the distances from the centers of components to table axis; (ii) minimization of the position error between actual and nominal centers of the component; and (iii) central-axis-build assembly by minimizing the distances from the centers of components to a central axis. To test the assembly procedures, two typical assembly examples are considered using four identical rectangular components and four nonidentical rectangular components, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations are used to analyze the tolerance build-up, based on normally distributed random variables. The results show that assembly variations can be reduced significantly by selecting best relative orientation between mating parts. The results also show that procedures (i) and (ii) have the most potential to minimize the error build-up in the straight build of an assembly. For these procedures, the variation is reduced by 45% and 40% for identical and nonidentical components, respectively, compared to direct-build assembly. Procedure (iii) provides better performance than direct-build assembly for identical components assembly, while it gives smaller variation at the first two stages and larger variation at the third stage for nonidentical components assembly. This procedure could be used in an assembly with limited stages.
keyword(s): Manufacturing AND Errors ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | T. Hussain | |
| contributor author | Z. Yang | |
| contributor author | A. A. Popov | |
| contributor author | S. McWilliam | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:45:29Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:45:29Z | |
| date copyright | June, 2011 | |
| date issued | 2011 | |
| identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
| identifier other | JMSEFK-28465#031014_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/146887 | |
| description abstract | For assembly of rotating machines, such as machining tools, industrial turbomachinery, or aircraft gas turbine engines, parts need to be assembled in order to avoid internal bending of the geometric axis of the rotor to meet functional and vibration requirements. Straight-build assembly optimization is a way of joining parts together in order to have a straight line between the centers of the components. Straight-build assembly is achieved by minimizing eccentricity error stage-by-stage in the assembly. To achieve minimal eccentricity, this paper proposes three assembly procedures: (i) table-axis-build assembly by minimizing the distances from the centers of components to table axis; (ii) minimization of the position error between actual and nominal centers of the component; and (iii) central-axis-build assembly by minimizing the distances from the centers of components to a central axis. To test the assembly procedures, two typical assembly examples are considered using four identical rectangular components and four nonidentical rectangular components, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations are used to analyze the tolerance build-up, based on normally distributed random variables. The results show that assembly variations can be reduced significantly by selecting best relative orientation between mating parts. The results also show that procedures (i) and (ii) have the most potential to minimize the error build-up in the straight build of an assembly. For these procedures, the variation is reduced by 45% and 40% for identical and nonidentical components, respectively, compared to direct-build assembly. Procedure (iii) provides better performance than direct-build assembly for identical components assembly, while it gives smaller variation at the first two stages and larger variation at the third stage for nonidentical components assembly. This procedure could be used in an assembly with limited stages. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Straight-Build Assembly Optimization: A Method to Minimize Stage-by-Stage Eccentricity Error in the Assembly of Axisymmetric Rigid Components (Two-Dimensional Case Study) | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 133 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4004202 | |
| journal fristpage | 31014 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
| keywords | Manufacturing AND Errors | |
| tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |