YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Suction-Side Gill Region Film Cooling: Effects of Hole Shape and Orientation on Adiabatic Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 003::page 31022
    Author:
    Justin Chappell
    ,
    Phil Ligrani
    ,
    Sri Sreekanth
    ,
    Terry Lucas
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3151600
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The performance of suction-side gill region film cooling is investigated using the University of Utah transonic wind tunnel and a simulated turbine vane in a two-dimensional cascade. The effects of film cooling hole orientation, shape, and number of rows, and their resulting effects on thermal film cooling characteristics, are considered for four different hole configurations: round axial (RA), shaped axial (SA), round radial (RR), and round compound (RC). The mainstream Reynolds number based on axial chord is 500,000, the exit Mach number is 0.35, and the tests are conducted using the first row of holes only, second row of holes only, or both rows of holes at blowing ratios of 0.6 and 1.2. Carbon dioxide is used as the injectant to achieve density ratios of 1.73 to 1.92 similar to values present in operating gas turbine engines. A mesh grid is used to give a magnitude of longitudinal turbulence intensity of 5.7% at the inlet of the test section. Results show that the best overall protection over the widest range of blowing ratios and streamwise locations is provided by either the RC holes or the RR holes. This result is particularly significant because the RR hole arrangement, which has lower manufacturing costs compared with the RC and SA arrangements, produces better or equivalent levels of performance in terms of magnitudes of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient. Such improved performance (relative to RA and SA holes) is most likely a result of compound angles, which increases lateral spreading. As such, the present results indicate that compound angles appear to be more effective than hole shaping in improving thermal protection relative to that given by RA holes.
    keyword(s): Mach number , Temperature , Cooling , Suction , Shapes , Heat transfer coefficients , Flow (Dynamics) , Turbulence , Turbines , Gas turbines , Pressure AND Airfoils ,
    • Download: (1.268Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Suction-Side Gill Region Film Cooling: Effects of Hole Shape and Orientation on Adiabatic Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/145004
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJustin Chappell
    contributor authorPhil Ligrani
    contributor authorSri Sreekanth
    contributor authorTerry Lucas
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:41:34Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:41:34Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherJOTUEI-28764#031022_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145004
    description abstractThe performance of suction-side gill region film cooling is investigated using the University of Utah transonic wind tunnel and a simulated turbine vane in a two-dimensional cascade. The effects of film cooling hole orientation, shape, and number of rows, and their resulting effects on thermal film cooling characteristics, are considered for four different hole configurations: round axial (RA), shaped axial (SA), round radial (RR), and round compound (RC). The mainstream Reynolds number based on axial chord is 500,000, the exit Mach number is 0.35, and the tests are conducted using the first row of holes only, second row of holes only, or both rows of holes at blowing ratios of 0.6 and 1.2. Carbon dioxide is used as the injectant to achieve density ratios of 1.73 to 1.92 similar to values present in operating gas turbine engines. A mesh grid is used to give a magnitude of longitudinal turbulence intensity of 5.7% at the inlet of the test section. Results show that the best overall protection over the widest range of blowing ratios and streamwise locations is provided by either the RC holes or the RR holes. This result is particularly significant because the RR hole arrangement, which has lower manufacturing costs compared with the RC and SA arrangements, produces better or equivalent levels of performance in terms of magnitudes of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient. Such improved performance (relative to RA and SA holes) is most likely a result of compound angles, which increases lateral spreading. As such, the present results indicate that compound angles appear to be more effective than hole shaping in improving thermal protection relative to that given by RA holes.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSuction-Side Gill Region Film Cooling: Effects of Hole Shape and Orientation on Adiabatic Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3151600
    journal fristpage31022
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    keywordsMach number
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsCooling
    keywordsSuction
    keywordsShapes
    keywordsHeat transfer coefficients
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsPressure AND Airfoils
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian