Repair of Periprosthetic Pelvis Defects With Porous Metal Implants: A Finite Element StudySource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 002::page 21006Author:Eik Siggelkow
,
Roy D. Crowninshield
,
Dale A. Degroff
,
Danny L. Levine
,
Mehul A. Dharia
,
Douglas H. Wentz
DOI: 10.1115/1.4000853Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Periacetabular osteolysis is a potentially difficult surgical challenge, which can often drive the choice of reconstruction methods used in revision hip replacement. For smaller defects, impaction of bone grafts may be sufficient, but larger defects can require filler materials that provide structural support in addition to filling a void. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to examine the state of stress in periprosthetic pelvic bone when subjected to a stair-climbing load and in the presence of two simulated defects, to show the effect of implanting a defect repair implant fabricated from Trabecular Metal™ . Even a small medial bone defect showed a local stress elevation of 4× compared with that seen with an acetabular implant supported by intact periacetabular bone. Local bone stress was much greater (8× the baseline level) for a defect case in which the loss of bone superior to the acetabular implant permitted significant migration. FEA results showed that a repair of the small defect with a Trabecular Metal™ restrictor lowered periprosthetic bone stress to a level comparable to that in the case of a primary implant. For the larger defect case, the use of a Trabecular Metal™ augment provides structural stabilization and helps to restore the THR head center. However, stress in the adjacent periprosthetic bone is lower than that observed in the defect-free acetabulum. In the augment case, the load path between the femoral head and the pelvis now passes through the augment as the superior rim of the acetabulum has been replaced. Contact-induced stress in the augment is similar in magnitude to that seen in the superior rim of the baseline case, although the stress pattern in the augment is noticeably different from that in intact bone.
keyword(s): Metals , Maintenance , Product quality , Stress , Bone , Finite element analysis , Surgery AND Fillers (Materials) ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Eik Siggelkow | |
| contributor author | Roy D. Crowninshield | |
| contributor author | Dale A. Degroff | |
| contributor author | Danny L. Levine | |
| contributor author | Mehul A. Dharia | |
| contributor author | Douglas H. Wentz | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:36:42Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:36:42Z | |
| date copyright | February, 2010 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-27104#021006_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/142670 | |
| description abstract | Periacetabular osteolysis is a potentially difficult surgical challenge, which can often drive the choice of reconstruction methods used in revision hip replacement. For smaller defects, impaction of bone grafts may be sufficient, but larger defects can require filler materials that provide structural support in addition to filling a void. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to examine the state of stress in periprosthetic pelvic bone when subjected to a stair-climbing load and in the presence of two simulated defects, to show the effect of implanting a defect repair implant fabricated from Trabecular Metal™ . Even a small medial bone defect showed a local stress elevation of 4× compared with that seen with an acetabular implant supported by intact periacetabular bone. Local bone stress was much greater (8× the baseline level) for a defect case in which the loss of bone superior to the acetabular implant permitted significant migration. FEA results showed that a repair of the small defect with a Trabecular Metal™ restrictor lowered periprosthetic bone stress to a level comparable to that in the case of a primary implant. For the larger defect case, the use of a Trabecular Metal™ augment provides structural stabilization and helps to restore the THR head center. However, stress in the adjacent periprosthetic bone is lower than that observed in the defect-free acetabulum. In the augment case, the load path between the femoral head and the pelvis now passes through the augment as the superior rim of the acetabulum has been replaced. Contact-induced stress in the augment is similar in magnitude to that seen in the superior rim of the baseline case, although the stress pattern in the augment is noticeably different from that in intact bone. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Repair of Periprosthetic Pelvis Defects With Porous Metal Implants: A Finite Element Study | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 132 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4000853 | |
| journal fristpage | 21006 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Metals | |
| keywords | Maintenance | |
| keywords | Product quality | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Bone | |
| keywords | Finite element analysis | |
| keywords | Surgery AND Fillers (Materials) | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |