YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of the tanh and Exponential Fitting Methods for Charpy V-Notch Energy Data

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003::page 31404
    Author:
    Marjorie Ann EricksonKirk
    ,
    Mark T. EricksonKirk
    ,
    Stan Rosinski
    ,
    Jack Spanner
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3109987
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In the 1960s and 1970s, when the surveillance programs for currently operating commercial nuclear reactors were established, state of knowledge limitations resulted in the use of Charpy-V notch (CVN) specimens rather than fracture toughness specimens. Reasonable success has since been achieved in correlating CVN and fracture toughness parameters. Such correlations provide an important part of the technical basis for both current regulations and ASME codes. These correlations imply that trends manifest in CVN data must also appear in fracture toughness data, even though empirical evidence demonstrate that this is not always true. For example, the temperature dependence of CVN energy (CVE) in transition is thought to be a unique feature of each specific sample of ferritic steel that is tested, a view in sharp contrast with the now widely accepted view of a “master curve” for transition fracture toughness (KJc). Also, effects of product form on CVE temperature dependence and property correlations are widely reported, despite the fact that product form effects are absent from KJc properties. These observations suggest that the mapping of CVE behavior onto fracture toughness implicit to correlation-based regulations and ASME codes may produce erroneous trends in estimated values of fracture toughness. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that the apparent differences between CVE and fracture toughness arise due to differences in how the temperature dependence of CVE and KJc data have historically been modeled. Our analysis shows that when CVE data are analyzed in a manner consistent with KJc data (i.e., transition and upper shelf data are partitioned from each other and analyzed separately rather than being fit with a continuous tanh function), the apparent differences between CVE and toughness characterizations are minimized significantly, and may disappear entirely. These findings demonstrate the differences between CVE and fracture toughness data to be an artifact of the tanh analysis method rather than an intrinsic property of CVE.
    keyword(s): Temperature , Steel , Fittings , Fracture toughness , Databases AND Phase transition temperature ,
    • Download: (1.137Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of the tanh and Exponential Fitting Methods for Charpy V-Notch Energy Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/141810
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMarjorie Ann EricksonKirk
    contributor authorMark T. EricksonKirk
    contributor authorStan Rosinski
    contributor authorJack Spanner
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:35:07Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:35:07Z
    date copyrightJune, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28510#031404_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/141810
    description abstractIn the 1960s and 1970s, when the surveillance programs for currently operating commercial nuclear reactors were established, state of knowledge limitations resulted in the use of Charpy-V notch (CVN) specimens rather than fracture toughness specimens. Reasonable success has since been achieved in correlating CVN and fracture toughness parameters. Such correlations provide an important part of the technical basis for both current regulations and ASME codes. These correlations imply that trends manifest in CVN data must also appear in fracture toughness data, even though empirical evidence demonstrate that this is not always true. For example, the temperature dependence of CVN energy (CVE) in transition is thought to be a unique feature of each specific sample of ferritic steel that is tested, a view in sharp contrast with the now widely accepted view of a “master curve” for transition fracture toughness (KJc). Also, effects of product form on CVE temperature dependence and property correlations are widely reported, despite the fact that product form effects are absent from KJc properties. These observations suggest that the mapping of CVE behavior onto fracture toughness implicit to correlation-based regulations and ASME codes may produce erroneous trends in estimated values of fracture toughness. In this paper we investigate the hypothesis that the apparent differences between CVE and fracture toughness arise due to differences in how the temperature dependence of CVE and KJc data have historically been modeled. Our analysis shows that when CVE data are analyzed in a manner consistent with KJc data (i.e., transition and upper shelf data are partitioned from each other and analyzed separately rather than being fit with a continuous tanh function), the apparent differences between CVE and toughness characterizations are minimized significantly, and may disappear entirely. These findings demonstrate the differences between CVE and fracture toughness data to be an artifact of the tanh analysis method rather than an intrinsic property of CVE.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of the tanh and Exponential Fitting Methods for Charpy V-Notch Energy Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3109987
    journal fristpage31404
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsSteel
    keywordsFittings
    keywordsFracture toughness
    keywordsDatabases AND Phase transition temperature
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian