YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effect of Bottom Boundary on VIV for Energy Harnessing at 8×103<Re<1.5×105

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003::page 31102
    Author:
    K. Raghavan
    ,
    Michael M. Bernitsas
    ,
    D. E. Maroulis
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2979798
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The concept of extracting energy from ocean/river currents using vortex induced vibration was introduced at the OMAE2006 Conference. The vortex induced vibration aquatic clean energy (VIVACE) converter, implementing this concept, was designed and model tested; VIV amplitudes of two diameters were achieved for Reynolds numbers around 105 even for currents as slow as 1.6 kn. To harness energy using VIV, high damping was added. VIV amplitude of 1.3 diameters was maintained while extracting energy at a rate of PVIVACE=0.22×0.5×pU3DL at 1.6 kn. Strong dependence of VIV on Reynolds number was proven for the first time due to the range of Reynolds numbers achieved at the Low-Turbulence Free Surface Water (LTFSW) Channel of the University of Michigan. In this paper, proximity of VIVACE cylinders in VIV to a bottom boundary is studied in consideration of its impact on VIV, potential loss of harnessable energy, and effect on soft sediments. VIV tests are performed in the LTFSW Channel spanning the following ranges of parameters: Re∊[8×103–1.5×105], m∗∊[1.0–3.14], U∊[0.35–1.15 m/s], L/D∊[6–36], closest distance to bottom boundary (G/D)∊[4−0.1], and m∗ζ∊[0.14–0.26]. Test results show strong impact for gap to diameter ratio of G/D<3 on VIV, amplitude of VIV, range of synchronization, onset of synchronization, frequency of oscillation, hysteresis at the onset of synchronization, and hysteresis at the end of synchronization.
    keyword(s): Oscillations , Cylinders , Synchronization , Vortex-induced vibration , Water , Boundary layers , Reynolds number AND Vortices ,
    • Download: (2.301Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effect of Bottom Boundary on VIV for Energy Harnessing at 8×103&lt;Re&lt;1.5×105

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/141685
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorK. Raghavan
    contributor authorMichael M. Bernitsas
    contributor authorD. E. Maroulis
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:34:51Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:34:51Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otherJMOEEX-28346#031102_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/141685
    description abstractThe concept of extracting energy from ocean/river currents using vortex induced vibration was introduced at the OMAE2006 Conference. The vortex induced vibration aquatic clean energy (VIVACE) converter, implementing this concept, was designed and model tested; VIV amplitudes of two diameters were achieved for Reynolds numbers around 105 even for currents as slow as 1.6 kn. To harness energy using VIV, high damping was added. VIV amplitude of 1.3 diameters was maintained while extracting energy at a rate of PVIVACE=0.22×0.5×pU3DL at 1.6 kn. Strong dependence of VIV on Reynolds number was proven for the first time due to the range of Reynolds numbers achieved at the Low-Turbulence Free Surface Water (LTFSW) Channel of the University of Michigan. In this paper, proximity of VIVACE cylinders in VIV to a bottom boundary is studied in consideration of its impact on VIV, potential loss of harnessable energy, and effect on soft sediments. VIV tests are performed in the LTFSW Channel spanning the following ranges of parameters: Re∊[8×103–1.5×105], m∗∊[1.0–3.14], U∊[0.35–1.15 m/s], L/D∊[6–36], closest distance to bottom boundary (G/D)∊[4−0.1], and m∗ζ∊[0.14–0.26]. Test results show strong impact for gap to diameter ratio of G/D<3 on VIV, amplitude of VIV, range of synchronization, onset of synchronization, frequency of oscillation, hysteresis at the onset of synchronization, and hysteresis at the end of synchronization.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffect of Bottom Boundary on VIV for Energy Harnessing at 8×103<Re<1.5×105
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2979798
    journal fristpage31102
    identifier eissn1528-896X
    keywordsOscillations
    keywordsCylinders
    keywordsSynchronization
    keywordsVortex-induced vibration
    keywordsWater
    keywordsBoundary layers
    keywordsReynolds number AND Vortices
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian