YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms

    Source: Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics:;2009:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 001::page 11003
    Author:
    Sangamesh R. Deepak
    ,
    M. Dinesh
    ,
    Deepak K. Sahu
    ,
    G. K. Ananthasuresh
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2959094
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The topology optimization problem for the synthesis of compliant mechanisms has been formulated in many different ways in the past 15years, but there is not yet a definitive formulation that is universally accepted. Furthermore, there are two unresolved issues in this problem. In this paper, we present a comparative study of five distinctly different formulations that are reported in the literature. Three benchmark examples are solved with these formulations using the same input and output specifications and the same numerical optimization algorithm. A total of 35 different synthesis examples are implemented. The examples are limited to desired instantaneous output direction for prescribed input force direction. Hence, this study is limited to linear elastic modeling with small deformations. Two design parametrizations, namely, the frame element-based ground structure and the density approach using continuum elements, are used. The obtained designs are evaluated with all other objective functions and are compared with each other. The checkerboard patterns, point flexures, and the ability to converge from an unbiased uniform initial guess are analyzed. Some observations and recommendations are noted based on the extensive implementation done in this study. Complete details of the benchmark problems and the results are included. The computer codes related to this study are made available on the internet for ready access.
    keyword(s): Design , Optimization , Springs , Stiffness , Topology , Compliant mechanisms , Force AND Stress ,
    • Download: (929.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/141502
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSangamesh R. Deepak
    contributor authorM. Dinesh
    contributor authorDeepak K. Sahu
    contributor authorG. K. Ananthasuresh
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:34:37Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:34:37Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn1942-4302
    identifier otherJMROA6-27973#011003_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/141502
    description abstractThe topology optimization problem for the synthesis of compliant mechanisms has been formulated in many different ways in the past 15years, but there is not yet a definitive formulation that is universally accepted. Furthermore, there are two unresolved issues in this problem. In this paper, we present a comparative study of five distinctly different formulations that are reported in the literature. Three benchmark examples are solved with these formulations using the same input and output specifications and the same numerical optimization algorithm. A total of 35 different synthesis examples are implemented. The examples are limited to desired instantaneous output direction for prescribed input force direction. Hence, this study is limited to linear elastic modeling with small deformations. Two design parametrizations, namely, the frame element-based ground structure and the density approach using continuum elements, are used. The obtained designs are evaluated with all other objective functions and are compared with each other. The checkerboard patterns, point flexures, and the ability to converge from an unbiased uniform initial guess are analyzed. Some observations and recommendations are noted based on the extensive implementation done in this study. Complete details of the benchmark problems and the results are included. The computer codes related to this study are made available on the internet for ready access.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparative Study of the Formulations and Benchmark Problems for the Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume1
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2959094
    journal fristpage11003
    identifier eissn1942-4310
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsOptimization
    keywordsSprings
    keywordsStiffness
    keywordsTopology
    keywordsCompliant mechanisms
    keywordsForce AND Stress
    treeJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics:;2009:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian