Defining the Flexion-Extension Axis of the Ulna: Implications for Intra-Operative Elbow AlignmentSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 002::page 21005Author:James R. Brownhill
,
James E. Pichora
,
James A. Johnson
,
Graham J. King
,
Louis M. Ferreira
DOI: 10.1115/1.3005203Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The increased utilization of total elbow replacements has resulted in a correspondingly increased number of failed implants requiring revision. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening of the ulnar component due to polyethylene induced osteolysis. Implant malalignment is thought to be an important cause of bearing wear and implant failure. The ulnar flexion axis can be used to accurately align the ulnar component of the elbow implant; however, the optimal method of determining this axis intra-operatively is unknown. This in vitro study determined the relationship amongst kinematically and anatomically defined ulnar flexion axes in an effort to improve the accuracy of ulnar component positioning. Five different techniques were used to determine the ulnar flexion axis in 12 cadaveric specimens, 3 kinematic and 2 anatomic. The techniques were compared with the screw displacement axis from simulated elbow flexion. An anatomic measurement technique using the guiding ridge of the greater sigmoid notch of the ulna and the radial head was found to most accurately replicate the position and orientation of the screw displacement axis of the elbow (p<0.05). Because an anatomically derived flexion axis can be determined using both pre-operative imaging techniques, as well as with intra-operative guides, it is more practical than kinematically derived techniques requiring tracking systems for clinical application and should provide reliable and consistent results.
keyword(s): Wear , Motion , Screws , Bearings , Testing , Computers , Displacement , Failure , Imaging , Kinematics , Arthroplasty , Bone , Design , Surgery , Soft tissues AND Rotation ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | James R. Brownhill | |
| contributor author | James E. Pichora | |
| contributor author | James A. Johnson | |
| contributor author | Graham J. King | |
| contributor author | Louis M. Ferreira | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:31:49Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:31:49Z | |
| date copyright | February, 2009 | |
| date issued | 2009 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-26876#021005_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/140015 | |
| description abstract | The increased utilization of total elbow replacements has resulted in a correspondingly increased number of failed implants requiring revision. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening of the ulnar component due to polyethylene induced osteolysis. Implant malalignment is thought to be an important cause of bearing wear and implant failure. The ulnar flexion axis can be used to accurately align the ulnar component of the elbow implant; however, the optimal method of determining this axis intra-operatively is unknown. This in vitro study determined the relationship amongst kinematically and anatomically defined ulnar flexion axes in an effort to improve the accuracy of ulnar component positioning. Five different techniques were used to determine the ulnar flexion axis in 12 cadaveric specimens, 3 kinematic and 2 anatomic. The techniques were compared with the screw displacement axis from simulated elbow flexion. An anatomic measurement technique using the guiding ridge of the greater sigmoid notch of the ulna and the radial head was found to most accurately replicate the position and orientation of the screw displacement axis of the elbow (p<0.05). Because an anatomically derived flexion axis can be determined using both pre-operative imaging techniques, as well as with intra-operative guides, it is more practical than kinematically derived techniques requiring tracking systems for clinical application and should provide reliable and consistent results. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Defining the Flexion-Extension Axis of the Ulna: Implications for Intra-Operative Elbow Alignment | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3005203 | |
| journal fristpage | 21005 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Wear | |
| keywords | Motion | |
| keywords | Screws | |
| keywords | Bearings | |
| keywords | Testing | |
| keywords | Computers | |
| keywords | Displacement | |
| keywords | Failure | |
| keywords | Imaging | |
| keywords | Kinematics | |
| keywords | Arthroplasty | |
| keywords | Bone | |
| keywords | Design | |
| keywords | Surgery | |
| keywords | Soft tissues AND Rotation | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |