YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk of Rupture: Patient-Specific FSI Simulations Using Anisotropic Model

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003::page 31001
    Author:
    Peter Rissland
    ,
    John Ricotta
    ,
    Danny Bluestein
    ,
    Yared Alemu
    ,
    Shmuel Einav
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3005200
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture represents a major cardiovascular risk, combining complex vascular mechanisms weakening the abdominal artery wall coupled with hemodynamic forces exerted on the arterial wall. At present, a reliable method to predict AAA rupture is not available. Recent studies have introduced fluid structure interaction (FSI) simulations using isotropic wall properties to map regions of stress concentrations developing in the aneurismal wall as a much better alternative to the current clinical criterion, which is based on the AAA diameter alone. A new anisotropic material model of AAA that closely matches observed biomechanical AAA material properties was applied to FSI simulations of patient-specific AAA geometries in order to develop a more reliable predictor for its risk of rupture. Each patient-specific geometry was studied with and without an intraluminal thrombus (ILT) using two material models—the more commonly used isotropic material model and an anisotropic material model—to delineate the ILT contribution and the dependence of stress distribution developing within the aneurismal wall on the material model employed. Our results clearly indicate larger stress values for the anisotropic material model and a broader range of stress values as compared to the isotropic material, indicating that the latter may underestimate the risk of rupture. While the locations of high and low stresses are consistent in both material models, the differences between the anisotropic and isotropic models become pronounced at large values of strain—a range that becomes critical when the AAA risk of rupture is imminent. As the anisotropic model more closely matches the biomechanical behavior of the AAA wall and resolves directional strength ambiguities, we conclude that it offers a more reliable predictor of AAA risk of rupture.
    keyword(s): Stress , Engineering simulation , Rupture , Fluid structure interaction , Aneurysms , Pressure AND Geometry ,
    • Download: (1.519Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk of Rupture: Patient-Specific FSI Simulations Using Anisotropic Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/139991
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPeter Rissland
    contributor authorJohn Ricotta
    contributor authorDanny Bluestein
    contributor authorYared Alemu
    contributor authorShmuel Einav
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:31:47Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:31:47Z
    date copyrightMarch, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26901#031001_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/139991
    description abstractAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture represents a major cardiovascular risk, combining complex vascular mechanisms weakening the abdominal artery wall coupled with hemodynamic forces exerted on the arterial wall. At present, a reliable method to predict AAA rupture is not available. Recent studies have introduced fluid structure interaction (FSI) simulations using isotropic wall properties to map regions of stress concentrations developing in the aneurismal wall as a much better alternative to the current clinical criterion, which is based on the AAA diameter alone. A new anisotropic material model of AAA that closely matches observed biomechanical AAA material properties was applied to FSI simulations of patient-specific AAA geometries in order to develop a more reliable predictor for its risk of rupture. Each patient-specific geometry was studied with and without an intraluminal thrombus (ILT) using two material models—the more commonly used isotropic material model and an anisotropic material model—to delineate the ILT contribution and the dependence of stress distribution developing within the aneurismal wall on the material model employed. Our results clearly indicate larger stress values for the anisotropic material model and a broader range of stress values as compared to the isotropic material, indicating that the latter may underestimate the risk of rupture. While the locations of high and low stresses are consistent in both material models, the differences between the anisotropic and isotropic models become pronounced at large values of strain—a range that becomes critical when the AAA risk of rupture is imminent. As the anisotropic model more closely matches the biomechanical behavior of the AAA wall and resolves directional strength ambiguities, we conclude that it offers a more reliable predictor of AAA risk of rupture.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAbdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk of Rupture: Patient-Specific FSI Simulations Using Anisotropic Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3005200
    journal fristpage31001
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsStress
    keywordsEngineering simulation
    keywordsRupture
    keywordsFluid structure interaction
    keywordsAneurysms
    keywordsPressure AND Geometry
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian