YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Effects of Femoral Fixed Body Coordinate System Definition on Knee Kinematic Description

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 002::page 21014
    Author:
    Nathaniel M. Lenz
    ,
    Amitkumar Mane
    ,
    Lorin P. Maletsky
    ,
    Nicholas A. Morton
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2898713
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Understanding the differences in knee kinematic descriptions is important for comparing data from different laboratories and observing small but important changes within a set of knees. The purpose of this study was to identify how differences in fixed body femoral coordinate systems affect the described tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics for cadaveric knee studies with no hip present. Different methods for describing kinematics were evaluated on a set of seven cadaveric knees during walking in a dynamic knee simulator. Three anatomical landmark coordinate systems, a partial helical axis, and an experimental setup-based system were examined. The results showed that flexion-extension was insensitive to differences in the kinematic systems tested, internal-external rotation was similar for most femoral coordinate systems although there were changes in absolute position, varus-valgus was the most sensitive to variations in flexion axis direction, and anterior-posterior motion was most sensitive to femoral origin location. Femoral coordinate systems that define the sagittal plane using anatomical landmarks and locate the flexion axis perpendicular to the femur’s mechanical axis in the frontal plane were typically similar and described kinematics most consistently.
    keyword(s): Kinematics , Motion , Knee AND Rotation ,
    • Download: (548.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Effects of Femoral Fixed Body Coordinate System Definition on Knee Kinematic Description

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137488
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNathaniel M. Lenz
    contributor authorAmitkumar Mane
    contributor authorLorin P. Maletsky
    contributor authorNicholas A. Morton
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:02Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:27:02Z
    date copyrightApril, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26799#021014_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137488
    description abstractUnderstanding the differences in knee kinematic descriptions is important for comparing data from different laboratories and observing small but important changes within a set of knees. The purpose of this study was to identify how differences in fixed body femoral coordinate systems affect the described tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics for cadaveric knee studies with no hip present. Different methods for describing kinematics were evaluated on a set of seven cadaveric knees during walking in a dynamic knee simulator. Three anatomical landmark coordinate systems, a partial helical axis, and an experimental setup-based system were examined. The results showed that flexion-extension was insensitive to differences in the kinematic systems tested, internal-external rotation was similar for most femoral coordinate systems although there were changes in absolute position, varus-valgus was the most sensitive to variations in flexion axis direction, and anterior-posterior motion was most sensitive to femoral origin location. Femoral coordinate systems that define the sagittal plane using anatomical landmarks and locate the flexion axis perpendicular to the femur’s mechanical axis in the frontal plane were typically similar and described kinematics most consistently.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Effects of Femoral Fixed Body Coordinate System Definition on Knee Kinematic Description
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2898713
    journal fristpage21014
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsKinematics
    keywordsMotion
    keywordsKnee AND Rotation
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian