YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Particle Image Velocimetry and Phase Contrast MRI in a Patient-Specific Extracardiac Total Cavopulmonary Connection

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004::page 41004
    Author:
    Hiroumi D. Kitajima
    ,
    W. James Parks
    ,
    Oskar Skrinjar
    ,
    John N. Oshinski
    ,
    Ajit P. Yoganathan
    ,
    Kartik S. Sundareswaran
    ,
    Thomas Z. Teisseyre
    ,
    Garrett W. Astary
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2900725
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) have not been compared in complex biofluid environments. Such analysis is particularly useful to investigate flow structures in the correction of single ventricle congenital heart defects, where fluid dynamic efficiency is essential. A stereolithographic replica of an extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) is studied using PIV and PC-MRI in a steady flow loop. Volumetric two-component PIV is compared to volumetric three-component PC-MRI at various flow conditions. Similar flow structures are observed in both PIV and PC-MRI, where smooth flow dominates the extracardiac TCPC, and superior vena cava flow is preferential to the right pulmonary artery, while inferior vena cava flow is preferential to the left pulmonary artery. Where three-component velocity is available in PC-MRI studies, some helical flow in the extracardiac TCPC is observed. Vessel cross sections provide an effective means of validation for both experiments, and velocity magnitudes are of the same order. The results highlight similarities to validate flow in a complex patient-specific extracardiac TCPC. Additional information obtained by velocity in three components further describes the complexity of the flow in anatomic structures.
    keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Magnetic resonance imaging , Particulate matter , Fluids AND Vessels ,
    • Download: (1.535Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Particle Image Velocimetry and Phase Contrast MRI in a Patient-Specific Extracardiac Total Cavopulmonary Connection

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137427
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHiroumi D. Kitajima
    contributor authorW. James Parks
    contributor authorOskar Skrinjar
    contributor authorJohn N. Oshinski
    contributor authorAjit P. Yoganathan
    contributor authorKartik S. Sundareswaran
    contributor authorThomas Z. Teisseyre
    contributor authorGarrett W. Astary
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:26:57Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:26:57Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26817#041004_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137427
    description abstractParticle image velocimetry (PIV) and phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) have not been compared in complex biofluid environments. Such analysis is particularly useful to investigate flow structures in the correction of single ventricle congenital heart defects, where fluid dynamic efficiency is essential. A stereolithographic replica of an extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) is studied using PIV and PC-MRI in a steady flow loop. Volumetric two-component PIV is compared to volumetric three-component PC-MRI at various flow conditions. Similar flow structures are observed in both PIV and PC-MRI, where smooth flow dominates the extracardiac TCPC, and superior vena cava flow is preferential to the right pulmonary artery, while inferior vena cava flow is preferential to the left pulmonary artery. Where three-component velocity is available in PC-MRI studies, some helical flow in the extracardiac TCPC is observed. Vessel cross sections provide an effective means of validation for both experiments, and velocity magnitudes are of the same order. The results highlight similarities to validate flow in a complex patient-specific extracardiac TCPC. Additional information obtained by velocity in three components further describes the complexity of the flow in anatomic structures.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Particle Image Velocimetry and Phase Contrast MRI in a Patient-Specific Extracardiac Total Cavopulmonary Connection
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2900725
    journal fristpage41004
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsMagnetic resonance imaging
    keywordsParticulate matter
    keywordsFluids AND Vessels
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian