YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Study to Understand Perceptual Discrepancies Using Visual Illusions and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 007::page 744
    Author:
    Aslı Şahin
    ,
    Maria Bøe
    ,
    Janis Terpenny
    ,
    Jan Helge Bøhn
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2722321
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: There are often discrepancies in how a product is perceived in the different display media employed in typical product development processes. Product developers in many cases rely on different display media for design realizations. This study investigates if and how perceptual discrepancies change across different media and design groups. An experiment was designed and conducted at Virginia Tech to compare the perceptual differences of a simplified model of a car across three types of representation media: industrial design sketches, Computer aided design (CAD) models, and physical prototypes. The geometry of the car window was varied to simulate two visual illusions; architrave and irradiation. Two groups (industrial designers and engineers) with varying levels of experience (students and professionals) were studied. The experimental results were analyzed by applying a two-step data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to identify the trends of how the shape perception varied within and across the subject groups. This study and its findings are particularly important in several ways. First, the DEA approach provides an objective comparison of groups when differences in the participants’ evaluation skills and experience levels should be explicitly taken into account, important to understanding student learning and effectiveness of practitioners. Our study has shown that designers’ perceptual evaluation strategies change significantly across the groups. Findings of this study can be used for understanding perceptual discrepancies across media and groups in product design and development and could help to inform new approaches to design education research.
    keyword(s): Industrial design , Engineers , Irradiation (Radiation exposure) , Engineering students , Engineering prototypes , Computer-aided design , Students , Shapes , Design , Geometry AND Product development ,
    • Download: (232.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Study to Understand Perceptual Discrepancies Using Visual Illusions and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/136460
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAslı Şahin
    contributor authorMaria Bøe
    contributor authorJanis Terpenny
    contributor authorJan Helge Bøhn
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:25:04Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:25:04Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27852#744_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/136460
    description abstractThere are often discrepancies in how a product is perceived in the different display media employed in typical product development processes. Product developers in many cases rely on different display media for design realizations. This study investigates if and how perceptual discrepancies change across different media and design groups. An experiment was designed and conducted at Virginia Tech to compare the perceptual differences of a simplified model of a car across three types of representation media: industrial design sketches, Computer aided design (CAD) models, and physical prototypes. The geometry of the car window was varied to simulate two visual illusions; architrave and irradiation. Two groups (industrial designers and engineers) with varying levels of experience (students and professionals) were studied. The experimental results were analyzed by applying a two-step data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to identify the trends of how the shape perception varied within and across the subject groups. This study and its findings are particularly important in several ways. First, the DEA approach provides an objective comparison of groups when differences in the participants’ evaluation skills and experience levels should be explicitly taken into account, important to understanding student learning and effectiveness of practitioners. Our study has shown that designers’ perceptual evaluation strategies change significantly across the groups. Findings of this study can be used for understanding perceptual discrepancies across media and groups in product design and development and could help to inform new approaches to design education research.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Study to Understand Perceptual Discrepancies Using Visual Illusions and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2722321
    journal fristpage744
    journal lastpage752
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsIndustrial design
    keywordsEngineers
    keywordsIrradiation (Radiation exposure)
    keywordsEngineering students
    keywordsEngineering prototypes
    keywordsComputer-aided design
    keywordsStudents
    keywordsShapes
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsGeometry AND Product development
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian