YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Integration of Possibility-Based Optimization and Robust Design for Epistemic Uncertainty

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 008::page 876
    Author:
    Byeng D. Youn
    ,
    Kyung K. Choi
    ,
    David Gorsich
    ,
    Liu Du
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2717232
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In practical engineering applications, there exist two different types of uncertainties: aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. This study attempts to develop a robust design optimization with epistemic uncertainty. For epistemic uncertainties, a possibility-based design optimization improves the failure rate, while a robust design optimization minimizes the product quality loss. In general, product quality loss is described using the first two statistical moments for aleatory uncertainty: mean and standard deviation. However, there is no metric for product quality loss defined when having epistemic uncertainty. This paper first proposes a new metric for product quality loss with epistemic uncertainty, and then a possibility-based robust design optimization. For numerical efficiency and stability, an enriched performance measure approach is employed for possibility-based robust design optimization, and the maximal possibility search is used for a possibility analysis. Three different types of robust objectives are considered for possibility-based robust design optimization: smaller-the-better type (S-Type), larger-the-better type (L-Type), and nominal-the-better type (N-Type). Examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of possibility-based robust design optimization using the proposed metric for product quality loss with epistemic uncertainty.
    keyword(s): Design , Optimization AND Uncertainty ,
    • Download: (456.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Integration of Possibility-Based Optimization and Robust Design for Epistemic Uncertainty

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/136442
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorByeng D. Youn
    contributor authorKyung K. Choi
    contributor authorDavid Gorsich
    contributor authorLiu Du
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:25:02Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:25:02Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27854#876_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/136442
    description abstractIn practical engineering applications, there exist two different types of uncertainties: aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. This study attempts to develop a robust design optimization with epistemic uncertainty. For epistemic uncertainties, a possibility-based design optimization improves the failure rate, while a robust design optimization minimizes the product quality loss. In general, product quality loss is described using the first two statistical moments for aleatory uncertainty: mean and standard deviation. However, there is no metric for product quality loss defined when having epistemic uncertainty. This paper first proposes a new metric for product quality loss with epistemic uncertainty, and then a possibility-based robust design optimization. For numerical efficiency and stability, an enriched performance measure approach is employed for possibility-based robust design optimization, and the maximal possibility search is used for a possibility analysis. Three different types of robust objectives are considered for possibility-based robust design optimization: smaller-the-better type (S-Type), larger-the-better type (L-Type), and nominal-the-better type (N-Type). Examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of possibility-based robust design optimization using the proposed metric for product quality loss with epistemic uncertainty.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleIntegration of Possibility-Based Optimization and Robust Design for Epistemic Uncertainty
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2717232
    journal fristpage876
    journal lastpage882
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsOptimization AND Uncertainty
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian