YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Low Volume Plastics Manufacturing Strategies

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 012::page 1225
    Author:
    Ruchi Karania
    ,
    David Kazmer
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2790978
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Plastic components are vital components of many engineered products, frequently representing 20–40% of the product value. While injection molding is the most common process for economically producing complex designs in large quantities, a large initial monetary investment and extended development time are required to develop appropriate tooling. For applications with lower or unknown production quantities, designers may prefer another process that has a lower development cost and lead time albeit with higher marginal costs and production times. A methodology is presented that assists the designer to select the most appropriate manufacturing process that trades off the total production costs with production lead times. The approach is to develop aggregate component cost and lead-time models as a function of production quantity from extensive industry data for an electrical enclosure consisting of two components. Binding quotes were secured from multiple suppliers for a variety of manufacturing processes including computer numerical control machining, fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, vacuum casting, direct fabrication, and injection molding with soft prototype and production tooling. The methodology yields a Pareto optimal set that compares the production costs and lead times as a function of the production quantity. The results indicate that the average cost per enclosure assembly is highly sensitive to the production quantity, with average costs varying by more than a factor of 100 for production quantities varying between 100 and 10,000 assemblies. Each of the processes is competitive with respect to total production cost and total production lead time under differing conditions; a flow chart is provided as an example of a decision support tool that can be provided to assist process selection during the product development process and thereby reduce the product development time and cost.
    keyword(s): Manufacturing , Plastics , Injection molding , Engineering prototypes , Machining AND Casting ,
    • Download: (830.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Low Volume Plastics Manufacturing Strategies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/136377
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRuchi Karania
    contributor authorDavid Kazmer
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:24:54Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:24:54Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27863#1225_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/136377
    description abstractPlastic components are vital components of many engineered products, frequently representing 20–40% of the product value. While injection molding is the most common process for economically producing complex designs in large quantities, a large initial monetary investment and extended development time are required to develop appropriate tooling. For applications with lower or unknown production quantities, designers may prefer another process that has a lower development cost and lead time albeit with higher marginal costs and production times. A methodology is presented that assists the designer to select the most appropriate manufacturing process that trades off the total production costs with production lead times. The approach is to develop aggregate component cost and lead-time models as a function of production quantity from extensive industry data for an electrical enclosure consisting of two components. Binding quotes were secured from multiple suppliers for a variety of manufacturing processes including computer numerical control machining, fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, vacuum casting, direct fabrication, and injection molding with soft prototype and production tooling. The methodology yields a Pareto optimal set that compares the production costs and lead times as a function of the production quantity. The results indicate that the average cost per enclosure assembly is highly sensitive to the production quantity, with average costs varying by more than a factor of 100 for production quantities varying between 100 and 10,000 assemblies. Each of the processes is competitive with respect to total production cost and total production lead time under differing conditions; a flow chart is provided as an example of a decision support tool that can be provided to assist process selection during the product development process and thereby reduce the product development time and cost.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLow Volume Plastics Manufacturing Strategies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2790978
    journal fristpage1225
    journal lastpage1233
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsManufacturing
    keywordsPlastics
    keywordsInjection molding
    keywordsEngineering prototypes
    keywordsMachining AND Casting
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian