YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Forced Convection Heat Transfer and Hydraulic Losses in Graphitic Foam

    Source: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 009::page 1237
    Author:
    A. G. Straatman
    ,
    N. C. Gallego
    ,
    Q. Yu
    ,
    L. Betchen
    ,
    B. E. Thompson
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2739621
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Experiments and computations are presented to quantify the convective heat transfer and the hydraulic loss that is obtained by forcing water through blocks of graphitic foam (GF) heated from one side. Experiments have been conducted in a small-scale water tunnel instrumented to measure the pressure drop and the temperature rise of water passing through the foam and the base temperature and heat flux into the foam block. The experimental data were then used to calibrate a thermal non-equilibrium finite-volume model to facilitate comparisons between GF and aluminum foam. Comparisons of the pressure drop indicate that both normal and compressed aluminum foams are significantly more permeable than GF. Results of the heat transfer indicate that the maximum possible heat dissipation from a given surface is reached using very thin layers of aluminum foam due to the inability of the foam to entrain heat into its internal structure. In contrast, graphitic foam is able to entrain heat deep into the foam structure due to its high extended surface efficiency and thus much more heat can be transferred from a given surface area. The higher extended surface efficiency is mainly due to the combination of moderate porosity and higher solid-phase conductivity.
    keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Heat , Temperature , Heat transfer , Fluids , Foams (Chemistry) , Aluminum , Conductivity , Porosity , Pressure drop , Water , Convection , Computer simulation , Forced convection , Equilibrium (Physics) , Carbon AND Permeability ,
    • Download: (237.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Forced Convection Heat Transfer and Hydraulic Losses in Graphitic Foam

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/136230
    Collections
    • Journal of Heat Transfer

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. G. Straatman
    contributor authorN. C. Gallego
    contributor authorQ. Yu
    contributor authorL. Betchen
    contributor authorB. E. Thompson
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:24:39Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:24:39Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0022-1481
    identifier otherJHTRAO-27823#1237_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/136230
    description abstractExperiments and computations are presented to quantify the convective heat transfer and the hydraulic loss that is obtained by forcing water through blocks of graphitic foam (GF) heated from one side. Experiments have been conducted in a small-scale water tunnel instrumented to measure the pressure drop and the temperature rise of water passing through the foam and the base temperature and heat flux into the foam block. The experimental data were then used to calibrate a thermal non-equilibrium finite-volume model to facilitate comparisons between GF and aluminum foam. Comparisons of the pressure drop indicate that both normal and compressed aluminum foams are significantly more permeable than GF. Results of the heat transfer indicate that the maximum possible heat dissipation from a given surface is reached using very thin layers of aluminum foam due to the inability of the foam to entrain heat into its internal structure. In contrast, graphitic foam is able to entrain heat deep into the foam structure due to its high extended surface efficiency and thus much more heat can be transferred from a given surface area. The higher extended surface efficiency is mainly due to the combination of moderate porosity and higher solid-phase conductivity.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleForced Convection Heat Transfer and Hydraulic Losses in Graphitic Foam
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2739621
    journal fristpage1237
    journal lastpage1245
    identifier eissn1528-8943
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsHeat
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsHeat transfer
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsFoams (Chemistry)
    keywordsAluminum
    keywordsConductivity
    keywordsPorosity
    keywordsPressure drop
    keywordsWater
    keywordsConvection
    keywordsComputer simulation
    keywordsForced convection
    keywordsEquilibrium (Physics)
    keywordsCarbon AND Permeability
    treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2007:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian