Show simple item record

contributor authorL. Noels
contributor authorR. Radovitzky
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:22:22Z
date available2017-05-09T00:22:22Z
date copyrightSeptember, 2007
date issued2007
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26656#1031_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/135043
description abstractDiscontinuous Galerkin methods are commonly derived by seeking a weak statement of the governing differential equations via a weighted-average approach allowing for discontinuous fields at the element interfaces of the discretization. In order to ensure consistency and stability of the formulation, this approach requires the definition of a numerical flux and a stabilization term. Discontinuous Galerkin methods may also be formulated from a linear combination of the governing and compatibility equations weighted by suitable operators. A third approach based on a variational statement of a generalized energy functional has been proposed recently for finite elasticity. This alternative approach naturally leads to an expression of the numerical flux and the stabilization terms in the context of large deformation mechanics problems. This paper compares these three approaches and establishes the conditions under which identical formulations are obtained.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAlternative Approaches for the Derivation of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Nonlinear Mechanics
typeJournal Paper
journal volume74
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.2712228
journal fristpage1031
journal lastpage1036
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsDeformation
keywordsEquations
keywordsGalerkin method
keywordsStability AND Flux (Metallurgy)
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2007:;volume( 074 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record