| contributor author | P. M. Byvaltsev | |
| contributor author | Researcher | |
| contributor author | K. Kawaike | |
| contributor author | Chief Researcher | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:18:18Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:18:18Z | |
| date copyright | January, 2005 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
| identifier other | JOTUEI-28717#230_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132856 | |
| description abstract | A comparative study of two transition zone models was carried out to assess their ability to simulate boundary layer laminar-turbulent transition. Transition modeling is based on the use of an algebraic equation for the intermittency distribution. The crucial difference between the models lies in the nondimensional breakdown rate formulation. A two-dimensional marching code was used to combine these models with the modified Johnson and King turbulence model and the algebraic “nonturbulence” model developed earlier. Flat plate and various turbine blade heat transfer measurements were used in the comparison. One model gave reasonably accurate results for most of the test cases considered. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Comparative Study of Two Transition Zone Models in Heat Transfer Predictions | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 127 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1731446 | |
| journal fristpage | 230 | |
| journal lastpage | 239 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Heat transfer | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Turbine blades | |
| keywords | Boundary layers | |
| keywords | Pressure gradient | |
| keywords | Pressure | |
| keywords | Measurement | |
| keywords | Viscosity | |
| keywords | Flat plates AND Equations | |
| tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |