Discussion: “Modeling of Film Thickness and Traction in a Variable Ratio Traction Drive Rig,” (Sharif, K. J., Evans, H. P., Snidle, R. W., and Newall, J. P., 2004, ASME J. of Tribology, 126(1), pp. 92–104)Source: Journal of Tribology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 002::page 458DOI: 10.1115/1.1843164Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Ordinary shear-thinning affects EHL film thickness by reducing the central thickness from the theoretical Newtonian value 1 and ordinary shear-thinning affects traction in point contacts by shifting the logarithmic traction gradient to higher rates 2 in a manner indistinguishable from a reduction in pressure dependence of low shear viscosity at high pressure 2. The models selected by the authors for shear-thinning are not recognizable as ordinary shear-thinning. The authors’ Eq. (10) was Eyring’s sinh law model for thixotropy 3. Thixotropy should not be an issue here since the traction fluid is not known to contain wax and in any event the waxy structures studied by Eyring were quite weak with approximately τo=0.01 MPa3. Eyring made very clear his opinion that the sinh law, Eq. (10), is not an accurate description of shear-thinning 4. The authors’ Eq. (11) is not constitutive as it results from inhomogeneous shear 5.
keyword(s): Tribology , Modeling , Film thickness , Traction AND Viscosity ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Scott Bair | |
contributor author | Philippe Vergne | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:18:00Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:18:00Z | |
date copyright | April, 2005 | |
date issued | 2005 | |
identifier issn | 0742-4787 | |
identifier other | JOTRE9-28731#458_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/132727 | |
description abstract | Ordinary shear-thinning affects EHL film thickness by reducing the central thickness from the theoretical Newtonian value 1 and ordinary shear-thinning affects traction in point contacts by shifting the logarithmic traction gradient to higher rates 2 in a manner indistinguishable from a reduction in pressure dependence of low shear viscosity at high pressure 2. The models selected by the authors for shear-thinning are not recognizable as ordinary shear-thinning. The authors’ Eq. (10) was Eyring’s sinh law model for thixotropy 3. Thixotropy should not be an issue here since the traction fluid is not known to contain wax and in any event the waxy structures studied by Eyring were quite weak with approximately τo=0.01 MPa3. Eyring made very clear his opinion that the sinh law, Eq. (10), is not an accurate description of shear-thinning 4. The authors’ Eq. (11) is not constitutive as it results from inhomogeneous shear 5. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Discussion: “Modeling of Film Thickness and Traction in a Variable Ratio Traction Drive Rig,” (Sharif, K. J., Evans, H. P., Snidle, R. W., and Newall, J. P., 2004, ASME J. of Tribology, 126(1), pp. 92–104) | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 127 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Tribology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1843164 | |
journal fristpage | 458 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8897 | |
keywords | Tribology | |
keywords | Modeling | |
keywords | Film thickness | |
keywords | Traction AND Viscosity | |
tree | Journal of Tribology:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |