YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Boundary Conditions on the Estimation of the Planar Biaxial Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 004::page 709
    Author:
    Wei Sun
    ,
    Michael J. Scott
    ,
    Michael S. Sacks
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1933931
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Evaluation and simulation of the multiaxial mechanical behavior of native and engineered soft tissues is becoming more prevalent. In spite of this growing use, testing methods have not been standardized and methodologies vary widely. The strong influence of boundary conditions were recently underscored by [2002, J. Materials Science: Materials in Medicine13, pp. 933–938] wherein substantially different experimental results were obtained using different sample gripping methods on the same specimens. As it is not possible to experimentally evaluate the effects of different biaxial test boundary conditions on specimen internal stress distributions, we conducted numerical simulations to explore these effects. A nonlinear Fung-elastic constitutive model (, 2003, JBME125, pp. 372–380, which fully incorporated the effects of in-plane shear, was used to simulate soft tissue mechanical behavior. Effects of boundary conditions, including varying the number of suture attachments, different gripping methods, specimen shapes, and material axes orientations were examined. Results demonstrated strong boundary effects with the clamped methods, while suture attachment methods demonstrated minimal boundary effects. Suture-based methods appeared to be best suited for biaxial mechanical tests of biological materials. Moreover, the simulations demonstrated that Saint-Venant’s effects depended significantly on the material axes orientation. While not exhaustive, these comprehensive simulations provide experimentalists with additional insight into the stress–strain fields associated with different biaxial testing boundary conditions, and may be used as a rational basis for the design of biaxial testing experiments.
    keyword(s): Stress , Engineering simulation , Testing , Boundary-value problems , Soft tissues , Constitutive equations , Mechanical properties , Biological tissues , Mechanical testing AND Shear (Mechanics) ,
    • Download: (490.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effects of Boundary Conditions on the Estimation of the Planar Biaxial Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/131371
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWei Sun
    contributor authorMichael J. Scott
    contributor authorMichael S. Sacks
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:15:21Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:15:21Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2005
    date issued2005
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26519#709_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/131371
    description abstractEvaluation and simulation of the multiaxial mechanical behavior of native and engineered soft tissues is becoming more prevalent. In spite of this growing use, testing methods have not been standardized and methodologies vary widely. The strong influence of boundary conditions were recently underscored by [2002, J. Materials Science: Materials in Medicine13, pp. 933–938] wherein substantially different experimental results were obtained using different sample gripping methods on the same specimens. As it is not possible to experimentally evaluate the effects of different biaxial test boundary conditions on specimen internal stress distributions, we conducted numerical simulations to explore these effects. A nonlinear Fung-elastic constitutive model (, 2003, JBME125, pp. 372–380, which fully incorporated the effects of in-plane shear, was used to simulate soft tissue mechanical behavior. Effects of boundary conditions, including varying the number of suture attachments, different gripping methods, specimen shapes, and material axes orientations were examined. Results demonstrated strong boundary effects with the clamped methods, while suture attachment methods demonstrated minimal boundary effects. Suture-based methods appeared to be best suited for biaxial mechanical tests of biological materials. Moreover, the simulations demonstrated that Saint-Venant’s effects depended significantly on the material axes orientation. While not exhaustive, these comprehensive simulations provide experimentalists with additional insight into the stress–strain fields associated with different biaxial testing boundary conditions, and may be used as a rational basis for the design of biaxial testing experiments.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffects of Boundary Conditions on the Estimation of the Planar Biaxial Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1933931
    journal fristpage709
    journal lastpage715
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsStress
    keywordsEngineering simulation
    keywordsTesting
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsSoft tissues
    keywordsConstitutive equations
    keywordsMechanical properties
    keywordsBiological tissues
    keywordsMechanical testing AND Shear (Mechanics)
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2005:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian