YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Optimality and Acceptance Criteria in Offshore Design

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 003::page 258
    Author:
    Oliver Kübler
    ,
    Michael Havbro Faber
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1782641
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The optimal design of offshore structures is formulated as a decision theoretical problem. The objective is to maximize the expected net present value of the life cycle benefit. The general optimization problem is simplified by taking into account the cost impacts of a possible reconstruction of the structure. The analytical solution to this problem has been derived for the case, where failure events follow a stationary Poisson process. The life cycle benefit is formulated in terms of the production profile, the design and construction costs, failure costs and reconstruction costs. In order to assess the effect of potential loss of lives, the costs of fatalities are included applying the concept of the Implied Costs of Averting a Fatality (ICAF). The suggested approach to optimal design, which can be applied for any type of offshore structure, is exemplified considering the special case of steel structures. Here, it is standard to represent the ultimate structural capacity in terms of the Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR). For the purpose of illustration, the relation between material usage and RSR, which is valid for monopod structures, is applied. Optimal RSR’s and corresponding annual failure rates are assessed for both manned and unmanned structures covering a wide range of different realistic ratios between the potential revenues and costs for construction, failure and reconstruction.
    keyword(s): Construction , Ocean engineering , Design , Cycles , Failure AND Acceptance criteria ,
    • Download: (232.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Optimality and Acceptance Criteria in Offshore Design

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/130617
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOliver Kübler
    contributor authorMichael Havbro Faber
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:14:02Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:14:02Z
    date copyrightAugust, 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otherJMOEEX-28244#258_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/130617
    description abstractThe optimal design of offshore structures is formulated as a decision theoretical problem. The objective is to maximize the expected net present value of the life cycle benefit. The general optimization problem is simplified by taking into account the cost impacts of a possible reconstruction of the structure. The analytical solution to this problem has been derived for the case, where failure events follow a stationary Poisson process. The life cycle benefit is formulated in terms of the production profile, the design and construction costs, failure costs and reconstruction costs. In order to assess the effect of potential loss of lives, the costs of fatalities are included applying the concept of the Implied Costs of Averting a Fatality (ICAF). The suggested approach to optimal design, which can be applied for any type of offshore structure, is exemplified considering the special case of steel structures. Here, it is standard to represent the ultimate structural capacity in terms of the Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR). For the purpose of illustration, the relation between material usage and RSR, which is valid for monopod structures, is applied. Optimal RSR’s and corresponding annual failure rates are assessed for both manned and unmanned structures covering a wide range of different realistic ratios between the potential revenues and costs for construction, failure and reconstruction.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOptimality and Acceptance Criteria in Offshore Design
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1782641
    journal fristpage258
    journal lastpage264
    identifier eissn1528-896X
    keywordsConstruction
    keywordsOcean engineering
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsFailure AND Acceptance criteria
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian