YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rheological Properties and Frictional Pressure Loss of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Coiled Tubing

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 002::page 153
    Author:
    Yunxu Zhou
    ,
    Graduate Research Assistant
    ,
    Subhash N. Shah
    ,
    Stephenson Chair Professor
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1669033
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several common well-drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids—Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.
    keyword(s): Pressure , Fluids , Drilling , Tubing , Friction , Flow (Dynamics) , Viscosity , Drag reduction , Polymers , Temperature AND Shear (Mechanics) ,
    • Download: (244.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rheological Properties and Frictional Pressure Loss of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Coiled Tubing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/130259
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYunxu Zhou
    contributor authorGraduate Research Assistant
    contributor authorSubhash N. Shah
    contributor authorStephenson Chair Professor
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:13:27Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:13:27Z
    date copyrightMarch, 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27195#153_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/130259
    description abstractThe rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several common well-drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids—Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRheological Properties and Frictional Pressure Loss of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Coiled Tubing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1669033
    journal fristpage153
    journal lastpage161
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsDrilling
    keywordsTubing
    keywordsFriction
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsViscosity
    keywordsDrag reduction
    keywordsPolymers
    keywordsTemperature AND Shear (Mechanics)
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian