Frictional Resistance of Antifouling Coating SystemsSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 006::page 1039Author:Michael P. Schultz
DOI: 10.1115/1.1845552Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: An experimental study has been made to compare the frictional resistance of several ship hull coatings in the unfouled, fouled, and cleaned conditions. Hydrodynamic tests were completed in a towing tank using a flat plate test fixture towed at a Reynolds number (ReL) range of 2.8×106–5.5×106 based on the plate length and towing velocity. The results indicate little difference in frictional resistance coefficient (CF) among the coatings in the unfouled condition. Significant differences were observed after 287 days of marine exposure, with the silicone antifouling coatings showing the largest increases in CF. While several of the surfaces returned to near their unfouled resistance after cleaning, coating damage led to significant increases in CF for other coatings. The roughness function ΔU+ for the unfouled coatings showed reasonable collapse to a Colebrook-type roughness function when the centerline average height (k=0.17Ra) was used as the roughness length scale. Excellent collapse of the roughness function for the barnacle fouled surfaces was obtained using a new roughness length scale based on the barnacle height and percent coverage.
keyword(s): Coating processes , Reynolds number , Surface roughness , Skin friction (Fluid dynamics) , Silicones , Uncertainty , Drag (Fluid dynamics) , Ships , Electrical resistance , Collapse , Coatings AND Statistical process control ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Michael P. Schultz | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:13:17Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:13:17Z | |
date copyright | November, 2004 | |
date issued | 2004 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | JFEGA4-27204#1039_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/130170 | |
description abstract | An experimental study has been made to compare the frictional resistance of several ship hull coatings in the unfouled, fouled, and cleaned conditions. Hydrodynamic tests were completed in a towing tank using a flat plate test fixture towed at a Reynolds number (ReL) range of 2.8×106–5.5×106 based on the plate length and towing velocity. The results indicate little difference in frictional resistance coefficient (CF) among the coatings in the unfouled condition. Significant differences were observed after 287 days of marine exposure, with the silicone antifouling coatings showing the largest increases in CF. While several of the surfaces returned to near their unfouled resistance after cleaning, coating damage led to significant increases in CF for other coatings. The roughness function ΔU+ for the unfouled coatings showed reasonable collapse to a Colebrook-type roughness function when the centerline average height (k=0.17Ra) was used as the roughness length scale. Excellent collapse of the roughness function for the barnacle fouled surfaces was obtained using a new roughness length scale based on the barnacle height and percent coverage. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Frictional Resistance of Antifouling Coating Systems | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 126 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1845552 | |
journal fristpage | 1039 | |
journal lastpage | 1047 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
keywords | Coating processes | |
keywords | Reynolds number | |
keywords | Surface roughness | |
keywords | Skin friction (Fluid dynamics) | |
keywords | Silicones | |
keywords | Uncertainty | |
keywords | Drag (Fluid dynamics) | |
keywords | Ships | |
keywords | Electrical resistance | |
keywords | Collapse | |
keywords | Coatings AND Statistical process control | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2004:;volume( 126 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |