Axial Compressor Aerodesign Evolution at General ElectricSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 003::page 321DOI: 10.1115/1.1486219Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: This paper traces the origins of the GE Design System and how it has evolved from early methods to underlie and supplement present CFD methods, which are not themselves discussed herein. The two main elements of the detailed aero design process are vector diagram establishment and airfoil design. Their evolution is examined, and examples of how they were used to design some early GE compressors of interest are given. By the late 1950s, some transonic airfoil shapes were being custom tailored using internal blade station data from more complete radial equilibrium solutions. In the 1960s, rules for shaping transonic passages were established, and by the 1970s, custom tailoring was done for subsonic blading as well. The preliminary design layout process for a new compressor is described. It involves selecting an annulus shape and blading overall proportions that will allow a successful detailed design to follow. This requires establishment of stage loading limits that permit stall-free operation, and an efficiency potential prediction method for state-of-the-art blading. As design methods evolved, the newer approaches were calibrated with data-match experience, a process that is expected to always be needed.
keyword(s): Compressors , Design , Blades , Flow (Dynamics) , Pressure , Shapes AND Engines ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Leroy H. Smith | |
contributor author | Consultant | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:08:54Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:08:54Z | |
date copyright | July, 2002 | |
date issued | 2002 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | JOTUEI-28697#321_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/127605 | |
description abstract | This paper traces the origins of the GE Design System and how it has evolved from early methods to underlie and supplement present CFD methods, which are not themselves discussed herein. The two main elements of the detailed aero design process are vector diagram establishment and airfoil design. Their evolution is examined, and examples of how they were used to design some early GE compressors of interest are given. By the late 1950s, some transonic airfoil shapes were being custom tailored using internal blade station data from more complete radial equilibrium solutions. In the 1960s, rules for shaping transonic passages were established, and by the 1970s, custom tailoring was done for subsonic blading as well. The preliminary design layout process for a new compressor is described. It involves selecting an annulus shape and blading overall proportions that will allow a successful detailed design to follow. This requires establishment of stage loading limits that permit stall-free operation, and an efficiency potential prediction method for state-of-the-art blading. As design methods evolved, the newer approaches were calibrated with data-match experience, a process that is expected to always be needed. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Axial Compressor Aerodesign Evolution at General Electric | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 124 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1486219 | |
journal fristpage | 321 | |
journal lastpage | 330 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
keywords | Compressors | |
keywords | Design | |
keywords | Blades | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Shapes AND Engines | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |