YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Hydrodynamic Model Induced Differences in SPM Post Pitchfork Bifurcation Paths

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004::page 174
    Author:
    Alexandre N. Simos
    ,
    Celso P. Pesce
    ,
    Michael M. Bernitsas
    ,
    Stuart B. Cohen
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1510872
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Several models of the hydrodynamic forces acting on a ship hull in maneuvering have been developed in the last 50 years. These models make possible analysis of ship maneuverability in high and low speeds. Following Bernitsas et al. [1], such hydrodynamic models may be classified into two major schools: the hydrodynamic derivatives (HD) models (first school) and “cross-flow” models (second school). The former is based on Taylor series expansion of the forces while the corresponding coefficients are determined experimentally and remain velocity independent for relatively low velocities. The second school heuristically combines short-wing theory (Jones) and cross-flow experimental data. The aim of this work is to establish and review a certain discrepancy observed in post pitchfork bifurcation paths depending on which school of modeling is adopted. This discrepancy exists in the practical problem of a Single-Point Mooring (SPM) system in a steady ocean current. This discrepancy appears immediately after the point of pitchfork bifurcation of the equilibrium yaw angle versus the longitudinal position of the line attachment point on the hull. According to HD models (e.g., Abkowitz [2]) such a bifurcation curve is a square-root post pitchfork path (e.g., Papoulias and Bernitsas [3]) while cross-flow models (e.g. Leite et al. [4]) predict a different shape of this path at the onset of the post bifurcation curve. Although the practical effect of such a discrepancy may be negligible for SPM systems, this is valuable in assessing an important difference in the distinct approaches followed by the hydrodynamic schools of modeling. Specifically, viscous forces are modeled by odd nonlinear terms in velocity, which are bilinear in the cross-flow models and cubic in the HD models. In this work, experimental results on the aforementioned post pitchfork bifurcation paths are presented and the origin and relevance of the observed discrepancy are discussed. Finally, results presented by Hooft [5] show that yaw angle dependence on bilinear velocity terms regarding cross-flow coefficients would be necessary for a more precise representation of bifurcation patterns near the pitchfork bifurcation. Such patterns may be strongly influenced by hull form.
    keyword(s): Carbon fibers , Equilibrium (Physics) , Scanning probe microscopy , Bifurcation , Ships , Hull , Shapes , Force , Flow (Dynamics) , Drag (Fluid dynamics) , Containers AND Tankers ,
    • Download: (126.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Hydrodynamic Model Induced Differences in SPM Post Pitchfork Bifurcation Paths

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/127274
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlexandre N. Simos
    contributor authorCelso P. Pesce
    contributor authorMichael M. Bernitsas
    contributor authorStuart B. Cohen
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:08:20Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:08:20Z
    date copyrightNovember, 2002
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otherJMOEEX-28195#174_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/127274
    description abstractSeveral models of the hydrodynamic forces acting on a ship hull in maneuvering have been developed in the last 50 years. These models make possible analysis of ship maneuverability in high and low speeds. Following Bernitsas et al. [1], such hydrodynamic models may be classified into two major schools: the hydrodynamic derivatives (HD) models (first school) and “cross-flow” models (second school). The former is based on Taylor series expansion of the forces while the corresponding coefficients are determined experimentally and remain velocity independent for relatively low velocities. The second school heuristically combines short-wing theory (Jones) and cross-flow experimental data. The aim of this work is to establish and review a certain discrepancy observed in post pitchfork bifurcation paths depending on which school of modeling is adopted. This discrepancy exists in the practical problem of a Single-Point Mooring (SPM) system in a steady ocean current. This discrepancy appears immediately after the point of pitchfork bifurcation of the equilibrium yaw angle versus the longitudinal position of the line attachment point on the hull. According to HD models (e.g., Abkowitz [2]) such a bifurcation curve is a square-root post pitchfork path (e.g., Papoulias and Bernitsas [3]) while cross-flow models (e.g. Leite et al. [4]) predict a different shape of this path at the onset of the post bifurcation curve. Although the practical effect of such a discrepancy may be negligible for SPM systems, this is valuable in assessing an important difference in the distinct approaches followed by the hydrodynamic schools of modeling. Specifically, viscous forces are modeled by odd nonlinear terms in velocity, which are bilinear in the cross-flow models and cubic in the HD models. In this work, experimental results on the aforementioned post pitchfork bifurcation paths are presented and the origin and relevance of the observed discrepancy are discussed. Finally, results presented by Hooft [5] show that yaw angle dependence on bilinear velocity terms regarding cross-flow coefficients would be necessary for a more precise representation of bifurcation patterns near the pitchfork bifurcation. Such patterns may be strongly influenced by hull form.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleHydrodynamic Model Induced Differences in SPM Post Pitchfork Bifurcation Paths
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume124
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1510872
    journal fristpage174
    journal lastpage178
    identifier eissn1528-896X
    keywordsCarbon fibers
    keywordsEquilibrium (Physics)
    keywordsScanning probe microscopy
    keywordsBifurcation
    keywordsShips
    keywordsHull
    keywordsShapes
    keywordsForce
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsDrag (Fluid dynamics)
    keywordsContainers AND Tankers
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian