The Relationship Between Frictional Resistance and Roughness for Surfaces Smoothed by SandingSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 002::page 492Author:Michael P. Schultz
DOI: 10.1115/1.1459073Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: An experimental investigation has been carried out to document and relate the frictional resistance and roughness texture of painted surfaces smoothed by sanding. Hydrodynamic tests were carried out in a towing tank using a flat plate test fixture towed at a Reynolds number (ReL) range of 2.8×106−5.5×106 based on the plate length and freestream velocity. Results indicate an increase in frictional resistance coefficient (CF) of up to 7.3% for an unsanded, as-sprayed paint surface compared to a sanded, polished surface. Significant increases in CF were also noted on surfaces sanded with sandpaper as fine as 600-grit as compared to the polished surface. The results show that, for the present surfaces, the centerline average height (Ra) is sufficient to explain a large majority of the variance in the roughness function (ΔU+) in this Reynolds number range.
keyword(s): Surface roughness , Skin friction (Fluid dynamics) , Polishing AND Reynolds number ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Michael P. Schultz | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:07:49Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:07:49Z | |
| date copyright | June, 2002 | |
| date issued | 2002 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-27173#492_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/126977 | |
| description abstract | An experimental investigation has been carried out to document and relate the frictional resistance and roughness texture of painted surfaces smoothed by sanding. Hydrodynamic tests were carried out in a towing tank using a flat plate test fixture towed at a Reynolds number (ReL) range of 2.8×106−5.5×106 based on the plate length and freestream velocity. Results indicate an increase in frictional resistance coefficient (CF) of up to 7.3% for an unsanded, as-sprayed paint surface compared to a sanded, polished surface. Significant increases in CF were also noted on surfaces sanded with sandpaper as fine as 600-grit as compared to the polished surface. The results show that, for the present surfaces, the centerline average height (Ra) is sufficient to explain a large majority of the variance in the roughness function (ΔU+) in this Reynolds number range. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | The Relationship Between Frictional Resistance and Roughness for Surfaces Smoothed by Sanding | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 124 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1459073 | |
| journal fristpage | 492 | |
| journal lastpage | 499 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Surface roughness | |
| keywords | Skin friction (Fluid dynamics) | |
| keywords | Polishing AND Reynolds number | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |