Show simple item record

contributor authorLeRoy M. Fitzwater
contributor authorSteven R. Winterstein
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:05:54Z
date available2017-05-09T00:05:54Z
date copyrightNovember, 2001
date issued2001
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier otherJSEEDO-28308#364_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/125810
description abstractThis paper considers two distinct topics that arise in reliability-based wind turbine design. First, it illustrates how general probability models can be used to predict long-term design loads from a set of limited-duration, short-term load histories. Second, it considers in detail the precise choice of probability model to be adopted, for both flap and edge bending loads in both parked and operating turbine conditions. In particular, a 3-moment random peak model and a 3- or 4-moment random process model are applied and compared. For a parked turbine, all models are found to be virtually unbiased and to notably reduce uncertainty in estimating extreme loads (e.g., by roughly 50%). For an operating turbine, however, only the random peak model is found to retain these beneficial features. This suggests the advantage of the random peak model, which appears to capture the rotating blade behavior sufficiently well to accurately predict extremes.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePredicting Design Wind Turbine Loads from Limited Data: Comparing Random Process and Random Peak Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.1409561
journal fristpage364
journal lastpage371
identifier eissn1528-8986
keywordsStress
keywordsProbability
keywordsWind turbines
keywordsDesign
keywordsStochastic processes AND Turbines
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record