Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and ProceduresSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004::page 793Author:Fred Stern
,
Professor Mechanical Engineering and Research Engineer Fellow ASME
,
Hugh W. Coleman
,
Eminent Scholar in Propulsion
,
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
,
Eric G. Paterson
,
Associate Research Engineer
,
Robert V. Wilson
,
Assistant Research Engineer Mem. ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.1412235Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Part 1 of this two-part paper presents a comprehensive approach to verification and validation methodology and procedures for CFD simulations from an already developed CFD code applied without requiring availability of the source code for specified objectives, geometry, conditions, and available benchmark information. Concepts, definitions, and equations derived for simulation errors and uncertainties provide the overall mathematical framework. Verification is defined as a process for assessing simulation numerical uncertainty and, when conditions permit, estimating the sign and magnitude of the numerical error itself and the uncertainty in that error estimate. The approach for estimating errors and uncertainties includes (1) the option of treating the numerical error as deterministic or stochastic, (2) the use of generalized Richardson extrapolation for J input parameters, and (3) the concept of correction factors based on analytical benchmarks, which provides a quantitative metric to determine proximity of the solutions to the asymptotic range, accounts for the effects of higher-order terms, and are used for defining and estimating errors and uncertainties. Validation is defined as a process for assessing simulation modeling uncertainty by using benchmark experimental data and, when conditions permit, estimating the sign and magnitude of the modeling error itself. The approach properly takes into account the uncertainties in both the simulation and experimental data in assessing the level of validation. Interpretation of results of validation efforts both where the numerical error is treated as deterministic and stochastic are discussed. Part 2 provides an example for RANS simulations for a cargo/container ship where issues with regard to practical application of the methodology and procedures and interpretation of verification and validation results are discussed.
keyword(s): Errors , Uncertainty , Computational fluid dynamics , Equations , Engineering simulation AND Simulation ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Fred Stern | |
| contributor author | Professor Mechanical Engineering and Research Engineer Fellow ASME | |
| contributor author | Hugh W. Coleman | |
| contributor author | Eminent Scholar in Propulsion | |
| contributor author | Professor of Mechanical Engineering | |
| contributor author | Eric G. Paterson | |
| contributor author | Associate Research Engineer | |
| contributor author | Robert V. Wilson | |
| contributor author | Assistant Research Engineer Mem. ASME | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:05:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:05:06Z | |
| date copyright | December, 2001 | |
| date issued | 2001 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-27167#793_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/125360 | |
| description abstract | Part 1 of this two-part paper presents a comprehensive approach to verification and validation methodology and procedures for CFD simulations from an already developed CFD code applied without requiring availability of the source code for specified objectives, geometry, conditions, and available benchmark information. Concepts, definitions, and equations derived for simulation errors and uncertainties provide the overall mathematical framework. Verification is defined as a process for assessing simulation numerical uncertainty and, when conditions permit, estimating the sign and magnitude of the numerical error itself and the uncertainty in that error estimate. The approach for estimating errors and uncertainties includes (1) the option of treating the numerical error as deterministic or stochastic, (2) the use of generalized Richardson extrapolation for J input parameters, and (3) the concept of correction factors based on analytical benchmarks, which provides a quantitative metric to determine proximity of the solutions to the asymptotic range, accounts for the effects of higher-order terms, and are used for defining and estimating errors and uncertainties. Validation is defined as a process for assessing simulation modeling uncertainty by using benchmark experimental data and, when conditions permit, estimating the sign and magnitude of the modeling error itself. The approach properly takes into account the uncertainties in both the simulation and experimental data in assessing the level of validation. Interpretation of results of validation efforts both where the numerical error is treated as deterministic and stochastic are discussed. Part 2 provides an example for RANS simulations for a cargo/container ship where issues with regard to practical application of the methodology and procedures and interpretation of verification and validation results are discussed. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Comprehensive Approach to Verification and Validation of CFD Simulations—Part 1: Methodology and Procedures | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 123 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1412235 | |
| journal fristpage | 793 | |
| journal lastpage | 802 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Errors | |
| keywords | Uncertainty | |
| keywords | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| keywords | Equations | |
| keywords | Engineering simulation AND Simulation | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Erratum: “The Study of Distorted Grid Patterns for Flow-Through Conical Converging Dies by the Multi-triangular Velocity Field” (Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1984, 106, pp. 150–160), “Tool Fracture Probability Under Steady State Cutting Conditions” (Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1984, 106, pp. 161–167), “Tool Fracture Probability of Cutting Tools Under Different Exiting Conditions” (Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1984, 106, 168–170), and “Quantitative Expressions for Some Aspects of Surface Integrity of Electro Discharged Machined Components” (Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1984, 106, pp. 171–177)
J. Pan; W. Pachla; S. Rosenberry; B. Avitzur; W. S. Sampath; Y. M. Lee; M. C. Shaw; K. P. Rajurkar; S. M. Pandit (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 1984) -
Review of “Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century” by the National Academy of Engineering
Pierre Y. Julien (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007) -
Discussion of “<i>Definition of the Term “Engineering Surveying”</i>” by the Committee on Engineering Surveying of the Surveying Engineering Division (August, 1985)
Kenneth G. Gold; Albert J. Hebrank; John G. McEntyre (American Society of Civil Engineers, 1986)