YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Methods for Optimizing Air-Conditioning Systems According to the Exergonomic Approach

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004::page 304
    Author:
    Luigi Marletta
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1410934
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper discusses the comparison of three different methods for the optimization of an air-conditioning system from an exergonomic point of view. The reference design is an all air system in typical summer operation. To optimize the system on the basis of the exergonomic approach, it was necessary to the set up the physical model (based on mass, energy, and exergy balance equations) and the economic model in order to define the decision variables and the objective function. The latter is the total cost of the whole assembly, obtained by summing up the capital costs to the running costs. The Szargut-Tsatsaronis (S-T), the Montecarlo, and the Lagrange multipliers methods are then applied with the aim of minimizing the objective function. The results may be summarized as follows: the S-T method is an iterative procedure which allows the designer to control and guide the optimization process; however, the outcome may depend on the designer’s judgment and skill. The Monte Carlo method is an almost totally automated approach; it is based on stochastic techniques and may require relatively long run time. The Lagrange multipliers method, in addition to the optimum value for the decision variables, makes it possible to deduce the sensitivity coefficients, thus providing further information about system performance. For the case under consideration, the three methods provide comparable results in terms of decision variables and minimum global costs.
    keyword(s): Air conditioning , Exergy , Design , Optimization , Equations AND Flow (Dynamics) ,
    • Download: (206.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Methods for Optimizing Air-Conditioning Systems According to the Exergonomic Approach

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/125080
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLuigi Marletta
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:04:39Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:04:39Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherJERTD2-26499#304_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/125080
    description abstractThis paper discusses the comparison of three different methods for the optimization of an air-conditioning system from an exergonomic point of view. The reference design is an all air system in typical summer operation. To optimize the system on the basis of the exergonomic approach, it was necessary to the set up the physical model (based on mass, energy, and exergy balance equations) and the economic model in order to define the decision variables and the objective function. The latter is the total cost of the whole assembly, obtained by summing up the capital costs to the running costs. The Szargut-Tsatsaronis (S-T), the Montecarlo, and the Lagrange multipliers methods are then applied with the aim of minimizing the objective function. The results may be summarized as follows: the S-T method is an iterative procedure which allows the designer to control and guide the optimization process; however, the outcome may depend on the designer’s judgment and skill. The Monte Carlo method is an almost totally automated approach; it is based on stochastic techniques and may require relatively long run time. The Lagrange multipliers method, in addition to the optimum value for the decision variables, makes it possible to deduce the sensitivity coefficients, thus providing further information about system performance. For the case under consideration, the three methods provide comparable results in terms of decision variables and minimum global costs.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Methods for Optimizing Air-Conditioning Systems According to the Exergonomic Approach
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1410934
    journal fristpage304
    journal lastpage310
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    keywordsAir conditioning
    keywordsExergy
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsOptimization
    keywordsEquations AND Flow (Dynamics)
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian