YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Cement Stresses in Finite Element Analyses of Cemented Orthopaedic Implants

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 006::page 623
    Author:
    A. B. Lennon
    ,
    P. J. Prendergast
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1412452
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Stress analysis of the cement fixation of orthopaedic implants to bone is frequently carried out using finite element analysis. However, the stress distribution in the cement layer is usually intricate, and it is difficult to report it in a way that facilitates comparison of implants for pre-clinical testing. To study this problem, and make recommendations for stress reporting, a finite element analysis of a hip prosthesis implanted into a synthetic composite femur is developed. Three cases are analyzed: a fully bonded implant, a debonded implant, and a debonded implant where the cement is removed distal to the stem tip. In addition to peak stresses, and contour and vector plots, a stressed volume and probability-of-failure analysis is reported. It is predicted that the peak stress is highest for the debonded stem, and that removal of the distal cement more than halves this peak stress. This would suggest that omission of the distal cement is good for polished prostheses (as practiced for the Exeter design). However, if the percentage of cement stressed above a certain threshold (say 3 MPa) is considered, then the removal of distal cement is shown to be disadvantageous because a higher volume of cement is stressed to above the threshold. Vector plots clearly demonstrate the different load transfer for bonded and debonded prostheses: A bonded stem generates maximum tensile stresses in the longitudinal direction, whereas a debonded stem generates most tensile stresses in the hoop direction, except near the tip where tensile longitudinal stresses occur due to subsidence of the stem. Removal of the cement distal to the tip allows greater subsidence but alleviates these large stresses at the tip, albeit at the expense of increased hoop stresses throughout the mantle. It is concluded that a thorough analysis of cemented implants should not report peak stress, which can be misleading, but rather stressed volume, and that vector plots should be reported if a precise analysis of the load transfer mechanism is required.
    keyword(s): Stress , Cements (Adhesives) , Finite element analysis , Orthopedics , Failure , Probability AND Prostheses ,
    • Download: (570.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Cement Stresses in Finite Element Analyses of Cemented Orthopaedic Implants

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/124778
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. B. Lennon
    contributor authorP. J. Prendergast
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:04:10Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:04:10Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2001
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-26209#623_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124778
    description abstractStress analysis of the cement fixation of orthopaedic implants to bone is frequently carried out using finite element analysis. However, the stress distribution in the cement layer is usually intricate, and it is difficult to report it in a way that facilitates comparison of implants for pre-clinical testing. To study this problem, and make recommendations for stress reporting, a finite element analysis of a hip prosthesis implanted into a synthetic composite femur is developed. Three cases are analyzed: a fully bonded implant, a debonded implant, and a debonded implant where the cement is removed distal to the stem tip. In addition to peak stresses, and contour and vector plots, a stressed volume and probability-of-failure analysis is reported. It is predicted that the peak stress is highest for the debonded stem, and that removal of the distal cement more than halves this peak stress. This would suggest that omission of the distal cement is good for polished prostheses (as practiced for the Exeter design). However, if the percentage of cement stressed above a certain threshold (say 3 MPa) is considered, then the removal of distal cement is shown to be disadvantageous because a higher volume of cement is stressed to above the threshold. Vector plots clearly demonstrate the different load transfer for bonded and debonded prostheses: A bonded stem generates maximum tensile stresses in the longitudinal direction, whereas a debonded stem generates most tensile stresses in the hoop direction, except near the tip where tensile longitudinal stresses occur due to subsidence of the stem. Removal of the cement distal to the tip allows greater subsidence but alleviates these large stresses at the tip, albeit at the expense of increased hoop stresses throughout the mantle. It is concluded that a thorough analysis of cemented implants should not report peak stress, which can be misleading, but rather stressed volume, and that vector plots should be reported if a precise analysis of the load transfer mechanism is required.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEvaluation of Cement Stresses in Finite Element Analyses of Cemented Orthopaedic Implants
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1412452
    journal fristpage623
    journal lastpage628
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsStress
    keywordsCements (Adhesives)
    keywordsFinite element analysis
    keywordsOrthopedics
    keywordsFailure
    keywordsProbability AND Prostheses
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2001:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian