YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Offshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future Aspects

    Source: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 002::page 93
    Author:
    J. Wang
    ,
    O. Kieran
    DOI: 10.1115/1.533730
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The offshore installations (safety case) regulations were developed in the UK in 1992 and came into force in 1993 in response to the accepted findings of the Piper Alpha enquiry. Recently, “the offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations” (DCR 1996) were introduced to offshore safety analysis. From the earliest stages of the installation’s life cycle, operators must ensure that all safety-critical elements in both the software and system domains be assessed. Hazards can be identified and the risks associated with them can be assessed and evaluated using a number of techniques and decision-making strategies, all aimed at producing an installation with lifetime safety integrity. In this paper, following a brief review of the current status of offshore safety regulation in the UK, several offshore safety assessment frameworks are presented. These include top-down, bottom-up, probabilistic, and subjective approaches. The conditions under which each approach may be applied effectively and efficiently are discussed. Probabilistic safety-based decision-making and subjective safety-based decision-making are then studied. Two examples are used to demonstrate the decision-making approaches. Recommendations on further development in offshore safety analysis are suggested. [S0892-7219(00)00901-8]
    keyword(s): Safety , Ocean engineering , Design , Decision making , Events AND Failure ,
    • Download: (105.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Offshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future Aspects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/124153
    Collections
    • Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. Wang
    contributor authorO. Kieran
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:03:07Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:03:07Z
    date copyrightMay, 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0892-7219
    identifier otherJMOEEX-28146#93_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124153
    description abstractThe offshore installations (safety case) regulations were developed in the UK in 1992 and came into force in 1993 in response to the accepted findings of the Piper Alpha enquiry. Recently, “the offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations” (DCR 1996) were introduced to offshore safety analysis. From the earliest stages of the installation’s life cycle, operators must ensure that all safety-critical elements in both the software and system domains be assessed. Hazards can be identified and the risks associated with them can be assessed and evaluated using a number of techniques and decision-making strategies, all aimed at producing an installation with lifetime safety integrity. In this paper, following a brief review of the current status of offshore safety regulation in the UK, several offshore safety assessment frameworks are presented. These include top-down, bottom-up, probabilistic, and subjective approaches. The conditions under which each approach may be applied effectively and efficiently are discussed. Probabilistic safety-based decision-making and subjective safety-based decision-making are then studied. Two examples are used to demonstrate the decision-making approaches. Recommendations on further development in offshore safety analysis are suggested. [S0892-7219(00)00901-8]
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOffshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future Aspects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.533730
    journal fristpage93
    journal lastpage99
    identifier eissn1528-896X
    keywordsSafety
    keywordsOcean engineering
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsDecision making
    keywordsEvents AND Failure
    treeJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian