Offshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future AspectsSource: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 002::page 93DOI: 10.1115/1.533730Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The offshore installations (safety case) regulations were developed in the UK in 1992 and came into force in 1993 in response to the accepted findings of the Piper Alpha enquiry. Recently, “the offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations” (DCR 1996) were introduced to offshore safety analysis. From the earliest stages of the installation’s life cycle, operators must ensure that all safety-critical elements in both the software and system domains be assessed. Hazards can be identified and the risks associated with them can be assessed and evaluated using a number of techniques and decision-making strategies, all aimed at producing an installation with lifetime safety integrity. In this paper, following a brief review of the current status of offshore safety regulation in the UK, several offshore safety assessment frameworks are presented. These include top-down, bottom-up, probabilistic, and subjective approaches. The conditions under which each approach may be applied effectively and efficiently are discussed. Probabilistic safety-based decision-making and subjective safety-based decision-making are then studied. Two examples are used to demonstrate the decision-making approaches. Recommendations on further development in offshore safety analysis are suggested. [S0892-7219(00)00901-8]
keyword(s): Safety , Ocean engineering , Design , Decision making , Events AND Failure ,
|
Show full item record
contributor author | J. Wang | |
contributor author | O. Kieran | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:03:07Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:03:07Z | |
date copyright | May, 2000 | |
date issued | 2000 | |
identifier issn | 0892-7219 | |
identifier other | JMOEEX-28146#93_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124153 | |
description abstract | The offshore installations (safety case) regulations were developed in the UK in 1992 and came into force in 1993 in response to the accepted findings of the Piper Alpha enquiry. Recently, “the offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations” (DCR 1996) were introduced to offshore safety analysis. From the earliest stages of the installation’s life cycle, operators must ensure that all safety-critical elements in both the software and system domains be assessed. Hazards can be identified and the risks associated with them can be assessed and evaluated using a number of techniques and decision-making strategies, all aimed at producing an installation with lifetime safety integrity. In this paper, following a brief review of the current status of offshore safety regulation in the UK, several offshore safety assessment frameworks are presented. These include top-down, bottom-up, probabilistic, and subjective approaches. The conditions under which each approach may be applied effectively and efficiently are discussed. Probabilistic safety-based decision-making and subjective safety-based decision-making are then studied. Two examples are used to demonstrate the decision-making approaches. Recommendations on further development in offshore safety analysis are suggested. [S0892-7219(00)00901-8] | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Offshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future Aspects | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 122 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.533730 | |
journal fristpage | 93 | |
journal lastpage | 99 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-896X | |
keywords | Safety | |
keywords | Ocean engineering | |
keywords | Design | |
keywords | Decision making | |
keywords | Events AND Failure | |
tree | Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |