Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part II: Analysis and ResultsSource: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 004::page 267Author:Alok K. Jha
,
Omer K. Kiciman
,
Joseph M. Gebara
,
Bernhard Stahl
,
Consulting Engineer
,
Knut H. Dahl-Stamnes
DOI: 10.1115/1.1313531Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: An assessment of three offshore platforms in the Valhall field of the North Sea is described in this paper. Ultimate strength and reliability analyses were performed for the jacket-type platforms for four levels of sea floor subsidence. The nonlinear structural models of the platform elements, joints, and associated soil-structure interaction are summarized in a companion paper by Gebara et al., 2000, “Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part I: Approach,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 122 , pp. 260–266. Similarly, environmental loads and reliability acceptance criteria are presented by Pawsey et al., 1998, “Characterization of Environmental Loads on Subsiding Offshore Platforms,” OMAE98, Lisbon, Portugal, and Stahl et al., 1998, “Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms,” OMAE98, Lisbon, Portugal, respectively. This paper describes the procedures employed and results obtained for ultimate strength and reliability analysis. Ultimate platform strength was calculated using a pushover analysis in which environmental loads for increasingly rare events were applied incrementally until the platform failed. Failure was defined as formation of a limiting mechanism in the platform structure or foundation. Structural reliability analysis was performed to estimate the annual probability of platform failure as a function of subsidence level. The platform structural system was modeled in terms of two major subsystems that were assessed as likely to fail: (i) the platform deck, and (ii) the platform jacket and piles. Uncertainties were included in the loads, structural components, and soil strengths based on industry experience and data. First and second-order reliability methods (FORM/SORM) were used to estimate the annual failure probabilities. Consideration was given to the correlated nature of the failure modes due to the common environmental loads. The reliability results were compared with predefined acceptance criteria to judge the suitability of continued operations. [S0892-7219(00)00304-6]
keyword(s): Waves , Failure , Stress , Offshore platforms , Probability , Mechanisms , Event history analysis , Tensile strength AND Reliability ,
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Alok K. Jha | |
contributor author | Omer K. Kiciman | |
contributor author | Joseph M. Gebara | |
contributor author | Bernhard Stahl | |
contributor author | Consulting Engineer | |
contributor author | Knut H. Dahl-Stamnes | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:03:05Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T00:03:05Z | |
date copyright | November, 2000 | |
date issued | 2000 | |
identifier issn | 0892-7219 | |
identifier other | JMOEEX-28158#267_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124132 | |
description abstract | An assessment of three offshore platforms in the Valhall field of the North Sea is described in this paper. Ultimate strength and reliability analyses were performed for the jacket-type platforms for four levels of sea floor subsidence. The nonlinear structural models of the platform elements, joints, and associated soil-structure interaction are summarized in a companion paper by Gebara et al., 2000, “Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part I: Approach,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 122 , pp. 260–266. Similarly, environmental loads and reliability acceptance criteria are presented by Pawsey et al., 1998, “Characterization of Environmental Loads on Subsiding Offshore Platforms,” OMAE98, Lisbon, Portugal, and Stahl et al., 1998, “Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms,” OMAE98, Lisbon, Portugal, respectively. This paper describes the procedures employed and results obtained for ultimate strength and reliability analysis. Ultimate platform strength was calculated using a pushover analysis in which environmental loads for increasingly rare events were applied incrementally until the platform failed. Failure was defined as formation of a limiting mechanism in the platform structure or foundation. Structural reliability analysis was performed to estimate the annual probability of platform failure as a function of subsidence level. The platform structural system was modeled in terms of two major subsystems that were assessed as likely to fail: (i) the platform deck, and (ii) the platform jacket and piles. Uncertainties were included in the loads, structural components, and soil strengths based on industry experience and data. First and second-order reliability methods (FORM/SORM) were used to estimate the annual failure probabilities. Consideration was given to the correlated nature of the failure modes due to the common environmental loads. The reliability results were compared with predefined acceptance criteria to judge the suitability of continued operations. [S0892-7219(00)00304-6] | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Assessment of Offshore Platforms Under Subsidence—Part II: Analysis and Results | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 122 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.1313531 | |
journal fristpage | 267 | |
journal lastpage | 273 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-896X | |
keywords | Waves | |
keywords | Failure | |
keywords | Stress | |
keywords | Offshore platforms | |
keywords | Probability | |
keywords | Mechanisms | |
keywords | Event history analysis | |
keywords | Tensile strength AND Reliability | |
tree | Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |