YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Design by Composition for Layered Manufacturing*

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 001::page 91
    Author:
    Mike Binnard
    ,
    Mark R. Cutkosky
    DOI: 10.1115/1.533549
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Three dimensional rapid prototyping processes, also called layered manufacturing or solid freeform fabrication (SFF), promise designers the ability to automatically fabricate complex shapes. SFF processes were invented with the assumption that designers would submit complete part models for automated planning and manufacturing. This planning process is normally based on some form of “decomposition,” for example, slicing into layers. Especially for newer, more complex SFF processes, there are several disadvantages to this approach, primarily that decomposition is difficult and does not reliably produce good process plans. Furthermore, it is hard for the designer to get feedback on the manufacturability of his design, and today’s decomposition systems are not fully automated. This paper presents an alternative approach, “design by composition,” where users build designs from “primitives” that include high-level manufacturing plans. When the user combines two primitives with a Boolean operation, software will automatically generate a manufacturing plan for the new design from the plans for the source primitives. In contrast to the decomposition method, design by composition offers several benefits to designers, primarily access to manufacturability feedback during design-time, a greater degree of automation, the ability to create designs with embedded components (such as sensors, electronic circuits, bearings, and shafts), and enhanced control over manufacturing plans. These advantages make design by composition a more attractive approach to SFF processing, especially for designers who are new to these processes. [S1050-0472(00)01701-3]
    keyword(s): Manufacturing , Intersections , Algorithms , Design , Shapes , Computer software AND Geometry ,
    • Download: (840.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Design by Composition for Layered Manufacturing*

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/124116
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMike Binnard
    contributor authorMark R. Cutkosky
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:03:04Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:03:04Z
    date copyrightMarch, 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27667#91_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/124116
    description abstractThree dimensional rapid prototyping processes, also called layered manufacturing or solid freeform fabrication (SFF), promise designers the ability to automatically fabricate complex shapes. SFF processes were invented with the assumption that designers would submit complete part models for automated planning and manufacturing. This planning process is normally based on some form of “decomposition,” for example, slicing into layers. Especially for newer, more complex SFF processes, there are several disadvantages to this approach, primarily that decomposition is difficult and does not reliably produce good process plans. Furthermore, it is hard for the designer to get feedback on the manufacturability of his design, and today’s decomposition systems are not fully automated. This paper presents an alternative approach, “design by composition,” where users build designs from “primitives” that include high-level manufacturing plans. When the user combines two primitives with a Boolean operation, software will automatically generate a manufacturing plan for the new design from the plans for the source primitives. In contrast to the decomposition method, design by composition offers several benefits to designers, primarily access to manufacturability feedback during design-time, a greater degree of automation, the ability to create designs with embedded components (such as sensors, electronic circuits, bearings, and shafts), and enhanced control over manufacturing plans. These advantages make design by composition a more attractive approach to SFF processing, especially for designers who are new to these processes. [S1050-0472(00)01701-3]
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDesign by Composition for Layered Manufacturing*
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.533549
    journal fristpage91
    journal lastpage101
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    keywordsManufacturing
    keywordsIntersections
    keywordsAlgorithms
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsShapes
    keywordsComputer software AND Geometry
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian