YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Alternate Method to API RP 14E for Predicting Solids Erosion in Multiphase Flow

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 003::page 115
    Author:
    Brenton S. McLaury
    ,
    Siamack A. Shirazi
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1288209
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: One commonly used method for determining oil and gas production velocities is to limit production rates based on the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 14E (API RP 14E). This guideline contains an equation to calculate an “erosional” or a threshold velocity, presumably a flow velocity that is safe to operate. The equation only considers one factor, the density of the medium, and does not consider many other factors that can contribute to erosion in multiphase flow pipelines. Thus, factors such as fluid properties, flow geometry, type of metal, sand production rate and size distribution, and flow composition are not accounted for. In the present paper, a method is presented that has been developed with the goal of improving the procedure by accounting for many of the physical variables including fluid properties, sand production rate and size, and flowstream composition that affect sand erosion. The results from the model are compared with several experimental results provided in the literature. Additionally, the method is applied to calculate threshold flowstream velocities for sand erosion and the results are compared with API RP 14E. The results indicate that the form of the equation that is provided by the API RP 14E is not suitable for predicting a production flowstream velocity when sand is present. [S0195-0738(00)00203-X]
    keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Fluids , Sands , Multiphase flow , Erosion , American Petroleum Institute , Density , Equations , Geometry AND Particulate matter ,
    • Download: (186.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Alternate Method to API RP 14E for Predicting Solids Erosion in Multiphase Flow

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/123597
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrenton S. McLaury
    contributor authorSiamack A. Shirazi
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:02:15Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:02:15Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherJERTD2-26491#115_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123597
    description abstractOne commonly used method for determining oil and gas production velocities is to limit production rates based on the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 14E (API RP 14E). This guideline contains an equation to calculate an “erosional” or a threshold velocity, presumably a flow velocity that is safe to operate. The equation only considers one factor, the density of the medium, and does not consider many other factors that can contribute to erosion in multiphase flow pipelines. Thus, factors such as fluid properties, flow geometry, type of metal, sand production rate and size distribution, and flow composition are not accounted for. In the present paper, a method is presented that has been developed with the goal of improving the procedure by accounting for many of the physical variables including fluid properties, sand production rate and size, and flowstream composition that affect sand erosion. The results from the model are compared with several experimental results provided in the literature. Additionally, the method is applied to calculate threshold flowstream velocities for sand erosion and the results are compared with API RP 14E. The results indicate that the form of the equation that is provided by the API RP 14E is not suitable for predicting a production flowstream velocity when sand is present. [S0195-0738(00)00203-X]
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAn Alternate Method to API RP 14E for Predicting Solids Erosion in Multiphase Flow
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1288209
    journal fristpage115
    journal lastpage122
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsFluids
    keywordsSands
    keywordsMultiphase flow
    keywordsErosion
    keywordsAmerican Petroleum Institute
    keywordsDensity
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsGeometry AND Particulate matter
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;2000:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian