Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Zingales
contributor authorResearch Assistant
contributor authorI. Elishakoff
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:01:41Z
date available2017-05-09T00:01:41Z
date copyrightSeptember, 2000
date issued2000
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26157#472_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/123229
description abstractIn this study probabilistic and nonprobabilistic anti-optimization approaches are contrasted to evaluate their relative advantages and disadvantages while solving a mechanical problem in presence of vector uncertainty. The different cases that are analyzed in probabilistic setting that deal with either uniform or generic probability density functions for the uncertain variables varying in a rectangular domain. This case has been compared with interval analysis, a particular case of anti-optimization. The presence of a convex, smooth boundary of the uncertain domain has been also considered for comparing results obtained with these two alternative methods. It is shown that in case of vector uncertainty the anti-optimization method yields the same solution for the design problem as is provided by means of more complex probabilistic considerations. [S0021-8936(00)03103-2]
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAnti-Optimization Versus Probability in an Applied Mechanics Problem: Vector Uncertainty
typeJournal Paper
journal volume67
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.1313533
journal fristpage472
journal lastpage484
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsDensity
keywordsReliability
keywordsDesign
keywordsOptimization
keywordsProbability
keywordsUncertainty
keywordsFailure
keywordsFunctions AND Displacement
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2000:;volume( 067 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record